mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:36:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110112080620.GG2723@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294817081.8370.60.camel@marge.simson.net>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:24:41AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 12:05 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:40:32PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> 
> > > IMHO, task->cgroups will not change when autogroup take effect.
> > 
> > Yes and I believe this is cause for some of the weird semantics I see
> > with autogroup and cgroups. I am not sure if this has already been
> > discussed ealier, may be I need to go back and check the archives, but
> > consider this:
> > 
> > I have cpu cgroup mounted at /cgroup and see that all the tasks in the
> > system are listed in /cgroup/tasks file.
> > 
> > Now I start a task like this:
> > 
> > # ./while1 &
> > [1] 2761
> > 
> > and see that this task belongs to root cgroup.
> 
> Yes, cgroups sees cgroup associations, not autogroup associations.
> 
> > # grep 2761 /cgroup/tasks
> > 2671
> > 
> > But we know that this task really belongs to an autogroup and is not
> > sitting directly on root_task_group.
> 
> Yup, cgroups doesn't want it, so autogroup (if enabled) claims it.
> 
> > # cat /proc/2761/autogroup 
> > /autogroup-49 nice 0
> > 
> > So we have a task in an autogroup (which is a sub group of root_task_group)
> > but is being shown as part of root_task_group. Is this by design ?
> 
> Yes, it's supposed to be transparent to cgroups.

If cgroups doesn't want that task and if its transparent to cgroups,
why is it shown as part of /cgroups/tasks ? The task really doesn't
belong in there. Its not on the runqueue of root_task_group.

So basically I feel that a task consumed by autogroup shouldn't ideally be
shown in root cgroup's tasks file.

Regards,
Bharata.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-12  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-10  9:16 Bharata B Rao
2011-01-10 10:29 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2011-01-10 10:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-10 16:42     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-11 17:10       ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-11 18:48         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  3:37           ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  5:40             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  6:35               ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  7:24                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  8:06                   ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2011-01-12  8:47                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  9:26                       ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  6:17             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  6:42               ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  5:40           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  6:32             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  8:55               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  3:54               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  5:59                 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-13  6:02                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-13  6:13                   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  8:46                 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-17 13:16                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-15 15:46                   ` torbenh
2011-02-15 16:43                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-18 11:09                       ` torbenh
2011-02-18 12:50                         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-18 13:40                           ` torbenh
2011-02-22 12:24                           ` torbenh
2011-02-22 14:47                             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-28 17:53                               ` torbenh
2011-02-28 18:29                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-28 19:10                                   ` torbenh
2011-03-01  4:02                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-01  4:21                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-01 15:59                                         ` torbenh
2011-01-18 19:05                 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched, autogroup: Fix CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED sched_setscheduler() failure tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  5:43       ` [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  6:25         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110112080620.GG2723@in.ibm.com \
    --to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome