mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:02:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinsdFAkSouApSYDehtMEA41POWYF3dKvrMTO1Q9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=x-nO-Z7hG9b5t2FvuznHXaTSLPdS05wkXYMKA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>> sched, autogroup: fix CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED sched_setscheduler() failure.
>>
>> If CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is set, __sched_setscheduler() fails due to autogroup
>> not allocating rt_runtime.  Free unused/unusable rt_se and rt_rq, redirect RT
>> tasks to the root task group, and tell __sched_setscheduler() that it's ok.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> Reported-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This looks more clear ;)
>
> And a little comment below
>
>>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched.c           |    3 ++-
>>  kernel/sched_autogroup.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/sched_autogroup.h |    4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> @@ -106,6 +128,11 @@ task_wants_autogroup(struct task_struct
>>        return true;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline bool task_group_is_autogroup(struct task_group *tg)
>> +{
>> +       return tg != &root_task_group && tg->autogroup;
>
> Isn't just checking tg->autogroup sufficient?

But if task_group_is_autogroup() will be called in other place in the future,
checking (tg != &root_task_group) is needed.

>
> if tg == &root_task_group
>
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -4874,7 +4874,8 @@ recheck:
>>                 * assigned.
>>                 */
>>                if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
>> -                               task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0) {
>> +                               task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
>
> this check will fail.
>
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
> --
> Only stand for myself
>



-- 
Only stand for myself

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-13  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-10  9:16 Bharata B Rao
2011-01-10 10:29 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2011-01-10 10:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-10 16:42     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-11 17:10       ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-11 18:48         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  3:37           ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  5:40             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  6:35               ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  7:24                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  8:06                   ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  8:47                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  9:26                       ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  6:17             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  6:42               ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-12  5:40           ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  6:32             ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  8:55               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  3:54               ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  5:59                 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-13  6:02                   ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-01-13  6:13                   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13  8:46                 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-01-17 13:16                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-15 15:46                   ` torbenh
2011-02-15 16:43                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-18 11:09                       ` torbenh
2011-02-18 12:50                         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-18 13:40                           ` torbenh
2011-02-22 12:24                           ` torbenh
2011-02-22 14:47                             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-28 17:53                               ` torbenh
2011-02-28 18:29                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-28 19:10                                   ` torbenh
2011-03-01  4:02                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-01  4:21                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-01 15:59                                         ` torbenh
2011-01-18 19:05                 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched, autogroup: Fix CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED sched_setscheduler() failure tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2011-01-12  5:43       ` [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails Yong Zhang
2011-01-12  6:25         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTinsdFAkSouApSYDehtMEA41POWYF3dKvrMTO1Q9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®