From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signal: fix SIGCONT notification code
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:41:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110112204136.GB13830@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293016398-18001-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:13:15 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> If SIGCONT is received while the child process is stopped, the code should
> be CLD_CONTINUED. If SIGCONT is recieved while the child process is in the
> process of being stopped, it should be CLD_STOPPED.
If a process does
kill (PID, SIGSTOP);
<varying delay, possibly even from a different process>
kill (PID, SIGCONT);
does it mean the PID's parent may get different waitid() results?
Or even that PID will finally remain still `T (stopped)'?
I do not see it has any userland impact, the
PTRACE_ATTACH-to-T(stopped)-process is already racy for different reasons.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-12 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 11:13 [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: cleanups and fixes Tejun Heo
2010-12-22 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] signal: fix SIGCONT notification code Tejun Heo
2011-01-12 20:41 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2011-01-13 11:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-22 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach() Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 22:13 ` Roland McGrath
2011-01-27 13:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-28 7:02 ` Roland McGrath
2011-01-28 10:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-22 11:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] signal: remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 22:10 ` Roland McGrath
2010-12-22 11:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] ptrace: kill tracehook_notify_jctl() Tejun Heo
2011-01-17 22:14 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110112204136.GB13830@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®