From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110113211751.62e878d8@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201101050928.53979.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:28:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:07:37PM -0800, Abhijeet Dharmapurikar wrote:
> > > Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > >> device op. The PM core provides pm_generic_ functions implementing this
> > >> behaviour - use them to reduce coupling with future PM updates.
> >
> > > pm_generic_suspend() and others needs to be externed in linux/pm_runtime.h?
> >
> > Yes, there's a patch in -next for this already so this patch would need
> > to either wait for later in the merge window or go in via the PM tree
> > with the preceeding one (the original version of this patch was posted
> > as part of a series with the export patch).
>
> I would take it, but I'm still waiting for a word from Jean.
Sorry for the long silence, I was on vacation. I've just applied this
patch, and I will send it to Linus tomorrow.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-13 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-30 12:40 Mark Brown
2011-01-04 23:07 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-05 8:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-13 20:17 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-01-13 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110113211751.62e878d8@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®