From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:07:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D23A839.6030205@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293712813-4090-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Mark Brown wrote:
> When devices use dev_pm_ops the I2C API is implementing standard functionality
> for integration with runtime PM and for checking for the presence of a per
> device op. The PM core provides pm_generic_ functions implementing this
> behaviour - use them to reduce coupling with future PM updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 68 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 6b4cc56..6793c51 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -196,88 +196,60 @@ static int i2c_device_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
>
> - if (pm) {
> - if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> - return 0;
> - else
> - return pm->suspend ? pm->suspend(dev) : 0;
> - }
> -
> - return i2c_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + if (pm)
> + return pm_generic_suspend(dev);
pm_generic_suspend() and others needs to be externed in linux/pm_runtime.h?
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm
Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-30 12:40 Mark Brown
2011-01-04 23:07 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar [this message]
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Mark Brown
2011-01-05 8:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-13 20:17 ` Jean Delvare
2011-01-13 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D23A839.6030205@codeaurora.org \
--to=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®