mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] console: prevent registered consoles from dumping old kernel message over again
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:11:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110119161135.aee848bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294814926-1460-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:48:46 +0800
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:

> For a platform with many consoles like:
>  "console=tty1 console=ttyMFD2 console=ttyS0 earlyprintk=mrst"
> 
> Each time when the non "selected_console" (tty1 and ttyMFD2 here) get
> registered, the existing kernel message will be printed out on registered
> consoles again, the "mrst" early console will get some same message for
> 3 times, and "tty1" will get some for twice.
> 
> So try to temporarily disable registered console's printing when dump the
> existing kernel messages to the new console.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/printk.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
> index f64b899..ba7186b 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct console *bcon = NULL;
> +	struct console *con;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * before we register a new CON_BOOT console, make sure we don't
> @@ -1357,8 +1358,20 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
>  		con_start = log_start;
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Disable the existing consoles temporarily to prevent it from
> +		 * printing out kernel log again.
> +		 */
> +		for_each_console(con)
> +			if (con != newcon)
> +				con->flags &= ~CON_ENABLED;

Is it racy?  If some CPU does an unrelated printk in the middle of all
this, might that get lost?  Perhaps not, given the way we pass the
start/end indexes into log_buf[].

>  	}
>  	release_console_sem();
> +
> +	for_each_console(con)
> +		con->flags |= CON_ENABLED;

If a console previously had CON_ENABLED unset, this will bogusly set
it.  That will (at least) defeat the intent of a previous
console_stop().

How's about something like this?

--- a/kernel/printk.c~a
+++ a/kernel/printk.c
@@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ static unsigned con_start;	/* Index into
 static unsigned log_end;	/* Index into log_buf: most-recently-written-char + 1 */
 
 /*
+ * If exclusive_console is non-NULL then only this console is to be printed to.
+ */
+static struct console *exclusive_console;
+
+/*
  *	Array of consoles built from command line options (console=)
  */
 struct console_cmdline
@@ -460,6 +465,8 @@ static void __call_console_drivers(unsig
 	struct console *con;
 
 	for_each_console(con) {
+		if (exclusive_console && con != exclusive_console)
+			continue;
 		if ((con->flags & CON_ENABLED) && con->write &&
 				(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) ||
 				(con->flags & CON_ANYTIME)))
@@ -1358,8 +1365,15 @@ void register_console(struct console *ne
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
 		con_start = log_start;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
+		/*
+		 * We're about to replay the log buffer.  Only do this to the
+		 * just-registered console to avoid excessive message spam to
+		 * the already-registered consoles.
+		 */
+		exclusive_console = newcon;
 	}
 	release_console_sem();
+	exclusive_console = NULL;
 	console_sysfs_notify();
 
 	/*
_


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-20  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  6:48 Feng Tang
2011-01-12 11:14 ` Alan Cox
2011-01-12 14:51   ` Feng Tang
2011-01-12 14:50     ` Alan Cox
2011-01-20  0:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-01-20  1:44   ` Feng Tang
2011-01-20  1:51     ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-20  2:31       ` Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110119161135.aee848bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome