* [PATCH 2.6.38-rc6] block: bd_link_disk_holder() should hold on to holder_dir
@ 2011-02-24 8:56 Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2011-02-24 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds
Cc: linux-kernel, Neil Brown, Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw
The new implementation of bd_link_disk_holder() added by 49731baa41d
(block: restore multiple bd_link_disk_holder() support) didn't get an
extra reference for the holder_dir kobject of the slave bdev; however,
bdev kills holder_dir on removal, not release, so if the slave bdev is
removed while there are holder links, the holder_dir will be destroyed
while there still are holder links, which leads to oops later when
bd_unlink_disk_order() tries to remove those links.
Make bd_link_disk_holder() grab an extra reference for the slave's
holder_dir and put it in bd_unlink_disk_holder().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Tested-by: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
Jens, Linus, it's pretty late in the release cycle and I'm not sure
Jens is back yet so I'm writing to you both. It's an isolated and
relatively safe fix. I think how it gets routed doesn't matter too
much.
Thank you.
fs/block_dev.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 4fb8a34..94d41db 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -873,6 +873,11 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
ret = add_symlink(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir, &disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
if (ret)
goto out_del;
+ /*
+ * bdev could be deleted beneath us which would implicitly destroy
+ * the holder directory. Hold on to it.
+ */
+ kobject_get(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir);
list_add(&holder->list, &bdev->bd_holder_disks);
goto out_unlock;
@@ -909,6 +914,7 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
del_symlink(disk->slave_dir, &part_to_dev(bdev->bd_part)->kobj);
del_symlink(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir,
&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
+ kobject_put(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir);
list_del_init(&holder->list);
kfree(holder);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-02-24 8:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-24 8:56 [PATCH 2.6.38-rc6] block: bd_link_disk_holder() should hold on to holder_dir Tejun Heo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®