* [PATCH] acpi: Corrections of unchecked calls to request_region
@ 2011-02-28 19:56 Johan Wessfeldt
2011-02-28 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johan Wessfeldt @ 2011-02-28 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, Johan Wessfeldt
This patch introduces checks when acpi osl reserves resources by calling
request_region.
Please review:
Is it valid to return early when acpi_request_region() fails?
Signed-off-by: Johan Wessfeldt <johan.wessfeldt@gmail.com>
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index c90c76a..5c8c521 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -166,48 +166,77 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32 supported)
return supported;
}
-static void __init acpi_request_region (struct acpi_generic_address *addr,
+static int __init acpi_request_region(struct acpi_generic_address *addr,
unsigned int length, char *desc)
{
+ struct resource *pRes;
+
if (!addr->address || !length)
- return;
+ return -EIO;
/* Resources are never freed */
- if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO)
- request_region(addr->address, length, desc);
- else if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
- request_mem_region(addr->address, length, desc);
+ if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
+ pRes = request_region(addr->address, length, desc);
+ if (pRes == NULL)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ } else if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
+ pRes = request_mem_region(addr->address, length, desc);
+ if (pRes == NULL)
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static int __init acpi_reserve_resources(void)
{
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
- "ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK");
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
+ "ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
- "ACPI PM1b_EVT_BLK");
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
+ "ACPI PM1b_EVT_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
- "ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK");
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_control_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
+ "ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
- "ACPI PM1b_CNT_BLK");
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_control_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
+ "ACPI PM1b_CNT_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm_timer_length == 4)
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block, 4, "ACPI PM_TMR");
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm_timer_length == 4) {
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block,
+ 4, "ACPI PM_TMR"))
+ return -EIO;
+ }
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length,
- "ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK");
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length,
+ "ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
/* Length of GPE blocks must be a non-negative multiple of 2 */
- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length & 0x1))
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe0_block,
- acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length, "ACPI GPE0_BLK");
+ if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length & 0x1)) {
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe0_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length,
+ "ACPI GPE0_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
+ }
- if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length & 0x1))
- acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe1_block,
- acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length, "ACPI GPE1_BLK");
+ if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length & 0x1)) {
+ if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe1_block,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length,
+ "ACPI GPE1_BLK"))
+ return -EIO;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
1.7.2.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi: Corrections of unchecked calls to request_region
2011-02-28 19:56 [PATCH] acpi: Corrections of unchecked calls to request_region Johan Wessfeldt
@ 2011-02-28 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-02-28 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johan Wessfeldt; +Cc: lenb, linux-acpi, linux-kernel
On Monday, February 28, 2011, Johan Wessfeldt wrote:
> This patch introduces checks when acpi osl reserves resources by calling
> request_region.
Why is the patch necessary?
> Please review:
> Is it valid to return early when acpi_request_region() fails?
What do you mean by "return early"?
Rafael
> Signed-off-by: Johan Wessfeldt <johan.wessfeldt@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index c90c76a..5c8c521 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -166,48 +166,77 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32 supported)
> return supported;
> }
>
> -static void __init acpi_request_region (struct acpi_generic_address *addr,
> +static int __init acpi_request_region(struct acpi_generic_address *addr,
> unsigned int length, char *desc)
> {
> + struct resource *pRes;
> +
> if (!addr->address || !length)
> - return;
> + return -EIO;
>
> /* Resources are never freed */
> - if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO)
> - request_region(addr->address, length, desc);
> - else if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> - request_mem_region(addr->address, length, desc);
> + if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
> + pRes = request_region(addr->address, length, desc);
> + if (pRes == NULL)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + } else if (addr->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
> + pRes = request_mem_region(addr->address, length, desc);
> + if (pRes == NULL)
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int __init acpi_reserve_resources(void)
> {
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
> - "ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK");
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_event_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
> + "ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
>
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
> - "ACPI PM1b_EVT_BLK");
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_event_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_event_length,
> + "ACPI PM1b_EVT_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
>
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
> - "ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK");
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1a_control_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
> + "ACPI PM1a_CNT_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
>
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
> - "ACPI PM1b_CNT_BLK");
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm1b_control_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pm1_control_length,
> + "ACPI PM1b_CNT_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
>
> - if (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm_timer_length == 4)
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block, 4, "ACPI PM_TMR");
> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm_timer_length == 4) {
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block,
> + 4, "ACPI PM_TMR"))
> + return -EIO;
> + }
>
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block, acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length,
> - "ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK");
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length,
> + "ACPI PM2_CNT_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
>
> /* Length of GPE blocks must be a non-negative multiple of 2 */
>
> - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length & 0x1))
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe0_block,
> - acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length, "ACPI GPE0_BLK");
> + if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length & 0x1)) {
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe0_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe0_block_length,
> + "ACPI GPE0_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
> + }
>
> - if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length & 0x1))
> - acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe1_block,
> - acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length, "ACPI GPE1_BLK");
> + if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length & 0x1)) {
> + if (!acpi_request_region(&acpi_gbl_FADT.xgpe1_block,
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.gpe1_block_length,
> + "ACPI GPE1_BLK"))
> + return -EIO;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-28 20:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-28 19:56 [PATCH] acpi: Corrections of unchecked calls to request_region Johan Wessfeldt
2011-02-28 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®