mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:43:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110404234323.GC27628@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31800.1301959010@localhost>

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:16:50PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:55:11 PDT, Matt Helsley said:
> 
> > Now we're back with a new minimal patch set. You're asking us to do the same
> > thing and expect different results -- stack more patches on top and expect to
> > get it reviewed. OK, but what reason do we have to believe this time will be
> > any different?
> 
> Has the terrain changed any since last time? In particular, ISTR a bunch of
> activity in namespace support since last time - does that change what your
> patch set needs to do?

Good question.

Unfortunately it doesn't reduce what our patch set needs to do at this
point. The primary namespace changes that happened about 10+ kernel
versions ago (circa 2.6.28) are essential for containers and reliable
checkpoint/restart. Since then namespace improvements have nothing or very
little to do with enabling checkpoint/restart -- it's all for containers.

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-04 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-28 23:40 [RFC 00/10] container-based checkpoint/restart prototype ntl
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] Make exec_mmap extern ntl
2011-04-03 16:56   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] Introduce mm_has_pending_aio() helper ntl
2011-03-01 15:40   ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-01 16:04     ` Nathan Lynch
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] Introduce has_locks_with_owner() helper ntl
2011-04-03 18:55   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] Introduce vfs_fcntl() helper ntl
2011-04-03 18:57   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code ntl
2011-04-03 19:03   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 15:00     ` Nathan Lynch
2011-04-04 15:10       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 15:40         ` Nathan Lynch
2011-04-04 16:27           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 17:32             ` Oren Laadan
2011-04-04 21:43               ` Nathan Lynch
2011-04-04 22:03                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 23:42                   ` Dan Smith
2011-04-05  2:17                     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-05 19:18                       ` Nathan Lynch
2011-04-04 22:29                 ` Matt Helsley
2011-04-04 17:41             ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-04 18:51               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 19:42                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-04 20:29                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 21:55                   ` Matt Helsley
2011-04-04 23:15                     ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-04 23:16                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-04-04 23:43                       ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2011-04-04 22:11                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 22:53                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-04-04 21:20             ` Nathan Lynch
2011-04-04 21:53               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] Checkpoint/restart mm support ntl
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] Checkpoint/restart vfs support ntl
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] Add generic '->checkpoint' f_op to ext filesystems ntl
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] Add generic '->checkpoint()' f_op to simple char devices ntl
2011-02-28 23:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86_32 support for checkpoint/restart ntl
2011-03-01  1:08 ` [RFC 00/10] container-based checkpoint/restart prototype Nathan Lynch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110404234323.GC27628@count0.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®