* [PATCH] vt: Add K_OFF return value to vt_ioctl KDGKBMODE
@ 2011-03-17 8:47 Arthur Taylor
2011-04-07 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arthur Taylor @ 2011-03-17 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: gregkh
After adding support for K_OFF in KDSKBMODE, it was forgotten to
add support for returning it in KDGKBMODE.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Taylor <art@ified.ca>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index 937d172..e71477a 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
uival = ((kbd->kbdmode == VC_RAW) ? K_RAW :
(kbd->kbdmode == VC_MEDIUMRAW) ? K_MEDIUMRAW :
(kbd->kbdmode == VC_UNICODE) ? K_UNICODE :
+ (kbd->kbdmode == VC_OFF) ? K_OFF :
K_XLATE);
goto setint;
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vt: Add K_OFF return value to vt_ioctl KDGKBMODE
2011-03-17 8:47 [PATCH] vt: Add K_OFF return value to vt_ioctl KDGKBMODE Arthur Taylor
@ 2011-04-07 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2011-04-07 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arthur Taylor; +Cc: linux-kernel, gregkh
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:47:32 -0700
Arthur Taylor <art@ified.ca> wrote:
>
> After adding support for K_OFF in KDSKBMODE, it was forgotten to
> add support for returning it in KDGKBMODE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Taylor <art@ified.ca>
> ---
> drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
> index 937d172..e71477a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
> @@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
> uival = ((kbd->kbdmode == VC_RAW) ? K_RAW :
> (kbd->kbdmode == VC_MEDIUMRAW) ? K_MEDIUMRAW :
> (kbd->kbdmode == VC_UNICODE) ? K_UNICODE :
> + (kbd->kbdmode == VC_OFF) ? K_OFF :
> K_XLATE);
OK. Thanks. But. If you come across such monstrosities, please do not
permit them to live.
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c~vt-add-k_off-return-value-to-vt_ioctl-kdgkbmode-fix
+++ a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -698,11 +698,23 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
break;
case KDGKBMODE:
- uival = ((kbd->kbdmode == VC_RAW) ? K_RAW :
- (kbd->kbdmode == VC_MEDIUMRAW) ? K_MEDIUMRAW :
- (kbd->kbdmode == VC_UNICODE) ? K_UNICODE :
- (kbd->kbdmode == VC_OFF) ? K_OFF :
- K_XLATE);
+ switch (kbd->kbdmode) {
+ case VC_RAW:
+ uival = K_RAW;
+ break;
+ case VC_MEDIUMRAW:
+ uival = K_MEDIUMRAW;
+ break;
+ case VC_UNICODE:
+ uival = K_UNICODE;
+ break;
+ case VC_OFF:
+ uival = K_OFF;
+ break;
+ default:
+ uival = K_XLATE;
+ break;
+ }
goto setint;
/* this could be folded into KDSKBMODE, but for compatibility
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-07 23:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-17 8:47 [PATCH] vt: Add K_OFF return value to vt_ioctl KDGKBMODE Arthur Taylor
2011-04-07 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®