From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 00:08:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110516070849.GA20580@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110515065949.GA11330@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:59:49PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:04:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:49:31PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > On 05/14/2011 10:41 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > On 05/14/2011 09:14 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > >> On 05/14/2011 11:34 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >>>> and do the inspection afterwards.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> And here is a lightly-tested patch, which applies on tip/core/rcu.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This problem could account for both the long delays seen with e59fb312
> > > >>> (Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof) and the
> > > >>> shorter delays seen with a26ac245 (move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread).
> > > >>
> > > >> yes. it fixes the problem.
> > > >>
> > > >> for 1024g system when hotadd mem enabled in kernel config
> > > >>
> > > >> [ 31.814803] cpu_dev_init done
> > > >> [ 35.437163] memory_dev_init done
> > > >>
> > > >> even it is with gcc from opensuse 11.3
> > > >
> > > > got:
> > > >
> > > > [ 86.931217] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #0
> > > > [ 86.931272] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #25
> > > > [ 86.931278] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > [ 86.931290] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree.c:364 rcu_enter_nohz+0x44/0x76()
> > > > [ 86.931294] Hardware name: Sun Fire X4800 M2
> > > > [ 86.931297] Modules linked in:
> > > > [ 86.931303] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-rc7-tip-yh-04836-g5e42dc2-dirty #3
> > > > [ 86.931307] Call Trace:
> > > > [ 86.931333] [<ffffffff81080280>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
> > > > [ 86.931338] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #74
> > > > [ 86.931346] [<ffffffff810802b2>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> > > > [ 86.931356] [<ffffffff810d3615>] rcu_enter_nohz+0x44/0x76
> > > > [ 86.931370] [<ffffffff810ab3cb>] tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick+0x27d/0x366
> > > > [ 86.931381] [<ffffffff810391bc>] cpu_idle+0x7a/0xcc
> > > > [ 86.931397] [<ffffffff81bd1aa3>] rest_init+0xb7/0xbe
> > > > [ 86.931408] [<ffffffff81bd19ec>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
> > > > [ 86.931423] [<ffffffff82738e39>] start_kernel+0x3b2/0x3bd
> > > > [ 86.931428] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #94
> > > > [ 86.931436] [<ffffffff827382cc>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x9c/0xa0
> > > > [ 86.931446] [<ffffffff827384a8>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x1d8/0x1e3
> > > > [ 86.931463] ---[ end trace 2cfc591bf7de931f ]---
> > > > [ 86.931598] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #151
> > > > [ 86.931613] Switched to NOHz mode on CPU #152
> > >
> > > it seems gcc from Fedora 14 is not happy with this patch.
> > >
> > > [ 35.113696] cpu_dev_init done
> > > [ 155.963662] memory_dev_init done
> >
> > Hmmm... It looks like my attempts to make RCU recover from misnesting are
> > not completely foolproof. I will be especially happy to look into this
> > if you could look for the source of the irq_enter()/irq_exit() misnesting.
> >
> > (And yes, it still might be a bug in my code -- I will be looking at that
> > yet again as well.)
>
> And the way you can prove that it is my code rather than the arch
> code is to show that the warning happens on your system when the
> irq_enter()/irq_exit() calls are perfectly nested.
So I took another look at the RCU debugfs stats you provided earlier,
and realized that your system gets a lot more NMIs than do the ones
that I have access to. So as a diagnostic patch, I ifdefed out the
body of rcu_nmi_enter() and rcu_nmi_exit().
If everything works perfectly with this patch applied, that would point
to a race in those two functions. Please feel free to apply on top
of my earlier diagnostic patches or directly on tip/core/rcu -- either
would provide good information.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcutree.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 4a9e4aa..0d4a5b5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ void rcu_exit_nohz(void)
*/
void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
{
+#if 0
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0 &&
@@ -443,6 +444,7 @@ void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* See above. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
+#endif
}
/**
@@ -454,6 +456,7 @@ void rcu_nmi_enter(void)
*/
void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
{
+#if 0
struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
if (rdtp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 0 ||
@@ -466,6 +469,7 @@ void rcu_nmi_exit(void)
atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Force delay to next write. */
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1);
+#endif
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-16 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-08 15:18 Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-09 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-09 21:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-10 8:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-10 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-10 18:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-10 19:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-10 20:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 4:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-11 6:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 6:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-11 16:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 16:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 20:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-11 20:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 21:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-11 23:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-12 6:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 7:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-12 7:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-12 9:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-12 17:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-12 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-13 1:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-13 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 12:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-13 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 7:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 21:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 23:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-17 2:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-17 7:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-17 12:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-17 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-18 21:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-18 23:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-19 4:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-19 14:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-19 19:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-19 21:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-19 21:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-20 0:09 ` [PATCH] rcu: Fix unpaired rcu_irq_enter() from locking selftests Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-20 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 15:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-20 0:14 ` [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40 Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-13 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 16:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 21:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-14 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-14 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-14 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-15 3:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-15 4:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-15 5:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-15 5:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-15 6:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-15 6:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 7:08 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-05-16 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-15 6:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-15 22:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-16 5:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 22:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110516070849.GA20580@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome