* [PATCH] linux/seqlock.h should #include asm/processor.h for cpu_relax()
@ 2011-06-11 11:29 David Howells
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Howells @ 2011-06-11 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, akpm; +Cc: linux-am33-list, linux-kernel, David Howells
linux/seqlock.h should #include asm/processor.h as it uses cpu_relax().
Without this patch, I see:
CC arch/mn10300/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/time.h:8,
from include/linux/timex.h:56,
from include/linux/sched.h:57,
from arch/mn10300/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
include/linux/seqlock.h: In function 'read_seqbegin':
include/linux/seqlock.h:91: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax'
whilst building asb2364_defconfig on MN10300.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index e981189..c6db9fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
typedef struct {
unsigned sequence;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-06-11 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-11 11:29 [PATCH] linux/seqlock.h should #include asm/processor.h for cpu_relax() David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®