From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Cc: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 32bit NUMA and fakeNUMA broken for AMD CPUs
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:51:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110629105101.GK3386@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629094451.GJ3386@htj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:44:51AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm... I can't see how it would have worked before. amdtopology used
> ulong for @end and would simply have been zero. Maybe NUMA config
> failed and it booted as flatmem instead? Can you please post boot log
> before the patch?
Ooh, please forget about this one. I got confused and thought that
amdtopology was for 32bit only and then converted to apply to both 32
and 64. It was the other way around, so the machine didn't use to get
NUMA configuration at all.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 15:41 Conny Seidel
2011-06-26 10:22 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20110626223807.47cef5c6.conny.seidel_amd.com@marah.osrc.amd.com>
2011-06-28 9:41 ` [PATCH tip:x86/urgent] x86-32, NUMA: Fix boot regression caused by NUMA init unification on highmem machines Tejun Heo
2011-06-28 12:35 ` Conny Seidel
2011-07-01 15:26 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20110628174613.GP478@escobedo.osrc.amd.com>
2011-06-29 9:44 ` 32bit NUMA and fakeNUMA broken for AMD CPUs Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 10:51 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-06-29 12:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 12:55 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-29 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 16:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-30 13:13 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-30 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-30 16:32 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-30 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-30 17:04 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-07-01 16:22 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 1/2] x86: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ Tejun Heo
2011-07-01 16:23 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Tejun Heo
2011-07-09 8:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-09 8:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-11 8:34 ` [PATCH x86/urgent] x86: Disable AMD_NUMA for 32bit for now Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 14:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 18:58 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 14:20 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Hans Rosenfeld
2011-07-13 5:34 ` [tip:x86/numa] x86, numa: " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:44 [PATCH x86/mm 1/2] x86: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:45 ` [PATCH x86/mm 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 5:33 ` [tip:x86/numa] x86, mm: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ tip-bot for Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110629105101.GK3386@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=conny.seidel@amd.com \
--cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®