From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Cc: "Seidel, Conny" <Conny.Seidel@amd.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 32bit NUMA and fakeNUMA broken for AMD CPUs
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110630164216.GU3386@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110630163227.GU478@escobedo.osrc.amd.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:32:28PM +0200, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:55:57AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hmmm... it looks like the kernel is crashing from the other bug in
> > this thread. Can you please apply both patches on top of 3.0-rc5 and
> > re-test?
>
> Oh, thats why it looked so familiar :)
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce this panic on this machine earlier without
> DISCONTIGMEM.
>
> It works now with both patches, bootlog is attached.
Can you please attach boot log w/ SPARSEMEM? Let's see whether NUMA
config is being rejected correctly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 15:41 Conny Seidel
2011-06-26 10:22 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20110626223807.47cef5c6.conny.seidel_amd.com@marah.osrc.amd.com>
2011-06-28 9:41 ` [PATCH tip:x86/urgent] x86-32, NUMA: Fix boot regression caused by NUMA init unification on highmem machines Tejun Heo
2011-06-28 12:35 ` Conny Seidel
2011-07-01 15:26 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20110628174613.GP478@escobedo.osrc.amd.com>
2011-06-29 9:44 ` 32bit NUMA and fakeNUMA broken for AMD CPUs Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 10:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 12:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 12:55 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-29 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-29 16:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-30 13:13 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-30 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-30 16:32 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-06-30 16:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-06-30 17:04 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2011-07-01 16:22 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 1/2] x86: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ Tejun Heo
2011-07-01 16:23 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Tejun Heo
2011-07-09 8:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-09 8:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-11 8:34 ` [PATCH x86/urgent] x86: Disable AMD_NUMA for 32bit for now Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 14:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 18:58 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-11 14:20 ` [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Hans Rosenfeld
2011-07-13 5:34 ` [tip:x86/numa] x86, numa: " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:44 [PATCH x86/mm 1/2] x86: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:45 ` [PATCH x86/mm 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 5:33 ` [tip:x86/numa] x86, mm: s/PAGES_PER_ELEMENT/PAGES_PER_SECTION/ tip-bot for Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110630164216.GU3386@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Conny.Seidel@amd.com \
--cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome