From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Chris Evans <scarybeasts@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, kees.cook@canonical.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works.
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:07:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110701130705.GG12605@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim8CGx89nOg0HX=S1=arunBU3sEGQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Will Drewry wrote:
> >>
> >> > Since it seems that there'll be consumers (openssh, vsftpd,
> >> > kvm/qemu, chromium, chromium os) and feedback quieted down, what
> >> > are the next steps to get this to a pull/no-pull decision points
> >> > (or at least some Ack's or Nack's)? I know this patch series
> >> > crosses a number of maintainers, and I never know exactly what's
> >> > next when the feedback slows down.
> >>
> >> Are there any outstanding objections to this approach? How do the
> >> tracing folk feel about it?
> >
> > I think i outlined my objections a couple of times and haven't seen
> > them addressed.
>
> After our last discussion, I suggested changes which I then undertook
> and reposted. Those changes have been posted for over two weeks.
Have you addressed my basic objection of why we should go for a more
complex and less capable variant over a shared yet more capable
facility:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110526091518.GE26775@elte.hu
?
You are pushing the 'filter engine' approach currently, not the
(much) more unified 'event filters' approach.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-01 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 0:36 [PATCH v9 01/13] tracing: split out filter initialization and clean up uses Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] tracing: split out syscall_trace_enter construction Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] seccomp_filter: new mode with configurable syscall filters Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:30 ` Damien Miller
2011-06-24 20:20 ` Kees Cook
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:24 ` Chris Evans
[not found] ` <BANLkTimtYUyXbZjWhjK61B_1WBXE4MoAeA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-26 23:20 ` James Morris
2011-06-29 19:13 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-30 1:30 ` James Morris
2011-07-01 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 12:56 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-01 15:46 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:43 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 18:09 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-04 2:19 ` James Morris
2011-07-05 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 23:46 ` James Morris
2011-07-06 0:37 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Ted Ts'o
2011-07-05 23:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 2:54 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Eugene Teo
2011-07-01 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2011-07-04 16:09 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Greg KH
2011-07-01 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 21:34 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-06 18:24 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 15:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] x86: add HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] arm: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] microblaze: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] mips: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] s390: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: " Will Drewry
2011-08-30 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 0:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 1:45 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] sparc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] sh: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110701130705.GG12605@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome