* [BUGFIX][PATCH] gpiolib: add missing initialisation of bgc->dir
@ 2011-07-01 12:08 Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-01 12:08 ` [PATCH] add missing intialisation " Lothar Waßmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lothar Waßmann @ 2011-07-01 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Grant Likely, Lothar Waßmann
bgpio_init() does not initialise the shadow variable for the GPIO_GDIR
register. Thus the first 'set_direction' call will clear the whole
GPIO_GDIR register of the affected GPIO bank.
Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-01 12:08 [BUGFIX][PATCH] gpiolib: add missing initialisation of bgc->dir Lothar Waßmann
@ 2011-07-01 12:08 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 6:48 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lothar Waßmann @ 2011-07-01 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Grant Likely, Lothar Waßmann
---
drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
return ret;
bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
+ bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
return ret;
}
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-01 12:08 ` [PATCH] add missing intialisation " Lothar Waßmann
@ 2011-07-04 6:48 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 9:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lothar Waßmann; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> ---
> drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
> return ret;
>
> bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
> + bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
Hi Lothar.
You'll need to double check your email setup. The patch got emailed
separately from the description.
I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-04 6:48 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-07-04 9:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 15:39 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lothar Waßmann @ 2011-07-04 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Grant Likely writes:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
> > return ret;
> >
> > bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
> > + bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
>
> Hi Lothar.
>
> You'll need to double check your email setup. The patch got emailed
> separately from the description.
>
git-send-email did that.
> I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
> controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
> register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
> direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
>
That would mean, that external software would have to have access to
the bgpio internal data structures which is a Bad Thing(TM) IMO. Or we
need a function that allows to explicitly initialize the internal
shadow registers.
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-04 9:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
@ 2011-07-04 15:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 15:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lothar Waßmann; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Grant Likely writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
> > > + bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
> >
> > Hi Lothar.
> >
> > You'll need to double check your email setup. The patch got emailed
> > separately from the description.
> >
> git-send-email did that.
It appears that you asked it to send a cover letter, which you usually
don't want when sending a single patch. The patch description should
be part of the git commit itself.
>
> > I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
> > controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
> > register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
> > direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
> >
> That would mean, that external software would have to have access to
> the bgpio internal data structures which is a Bad Thing(TM) IMO. Or we
> need a function that allows to explicitly initialize the internal
> shadow registers.
What device are you using this for. Are you using the basic gpio
platform_driver, or do you have a driver using the library part of the
basic gpio code?
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-04 15:39 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-07-04 15:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 16:00 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lothar Waßmann @ 2011-07-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Grant Likely writes:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Grant Likely writes:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > > index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > > @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
> > > > + bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
> > >
> > > Hi Lothar.
> > >
> > > You'll need to double check your email setup. The patch got emailed
> > > separately from the description.
> > >
> > git-send-email did that.
>
> It appears that you asked it to send a cover letter, which you usually
> don't want when sending a single patch. The patch description should
> be part of the git commit itself.
>
Yes, I noticed that already.
> > > I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
> > > controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
> > > register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
> > > direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
> > >
> > That would mean, that external software would have to have access to
> > the bgpio internal data structures which is a Bad Thing(TM) IMO. Or we
> > need a function that allows to explicitly initialize the internal
> > shadow registers.
>
> What device are you using this for. Are you using the basic gpio
> platform_driver, or do you have a driver using the library part of the
> basic gpio code?
>
I'm using it via drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-04 15:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
@ 2011-07-04 16:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 16:19 ` Lothar Waßmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-07-04 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lothar Waßmann; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Lothar Waßmann <LW@karo-electronics.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Grant Likely writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Grant Likely writes:
>> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> > > > ---
>> > > > drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c | 1 +
>> > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
>> > > > index 8152e9f..e69a453 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
>> > > > @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ int __devinit bgpio_init(struct bgpio_chip *bgc,
>> > > > return ret;
>> > > >
>> > > > bgc->data = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dat);
>> > > > + bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);
>> > >
>> > > Hi Lothar.
>> > >
>> > > You'll need to double check your email setup. The patch got emailed
>> > > separately from the description.
>> > >
>> > git-send-email did that.
>>
>> It appears that you asked it to send a cover letter, which you usually
>> don't want when sending a single patch. The patch description should
>> be part of the git commit itself.
>>
> Yes, I noticed that already.
>
>> > > I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
>> > > controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
>> > > register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
>> > > direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
>> > >
>> > That would mean, that external software would have to have access to
>> > the bgpio internal data structures which is a Bad Thing(TM) IMO. Or we
>> > need a function that allows to explicitly initialize the internal
>> > shadow registers.
>>
>> What device are you using this for. Are you using the basic gpio
>> platform_driver, or do you have a driver using the library part of the
>> basic gpio code?
>>
> I'm using it via drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.
You can safely do the "bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);" in
gpio-mxc after bgpio_init returns.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] add missing intialisation of bgc->dir
2011-07-04 16:00 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-07-04 16:19 ` Lothar Waßmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lothar Waßmann @ 2011-07-04 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Grant Likely writes:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Lothar Waßmann <LW@karo-electronics.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> > > I don't know if this is a valid thing to do or not. Not every GPIO
> >> > > controller supports reading back the initial state from the direction
> >> > > register. I suspect it is better to leave initialization of the
> >> > > direction to the gpio controller driver itself.
> >> > >
> >> > That would mean, that external software would have to have access to
> >> > the bgpio internal data structures which is a Bad Thing(TM) IMO. Or we
> >> > need a function that allows to explicitly initialize the internal
> >> > shadow registers.
> >>
> >> What device are you using this for. Are you using the basic gpio
> >> platform_driver, or do you have a driver using the library part of the
> >> basic gpio code?
> >>
> > I'm using it via drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.
>
> You can safely do the "bgc->dir = bgc->read_reg(bgc->reg_dir);" in
> gpio-mxc after bgpio_init returns.
>
I know I can do that, but IMO it's a horrible way of programming, to
let a higher SW layer freely mess with the data structures of another
SW layer. There should be accessor functions to do that!
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-04 16:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-01 12:08 [BUGFIX][PATCH] gpiolib: add missing initialisation of bgc->dir Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-01 12:08 ` [PATCH] add missing intialisation " Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 6:48 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 9:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 15:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 15:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-07-04 16:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 16:19 ` Lothar Waßmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®