* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-08-28 19:26 ` [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c Peter Huewe
@ 2011-08-28 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-29 8:41 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-05 12:45 ` Linus Walleij
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2011-08-28 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Huewe
Cc: Linus Walleij, Rafael J. Wysocki, Grant Likely,
spi-devel-general, linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:26:59PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
> doesn't even compile ;)
Maybe it was tested on configs without CONFIG_SUSPEND enabled - which
is highly likely since my ARM development boards don't support S2RAM.
That's the problem with ifdef'ing code. It makes it impossible to
ensure that it's properly tested.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-08-28 19:26 ` [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c Peter Huewe
2011-08-28 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2011-08-29 8:41 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-05 12:45 ` Linus Walleij
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2011-08-29 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Huewe
Cc: Russell King, Rafael J. Wysocki, Grant Likely, spi-devel-general,
linux-kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> wrote:
> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
> doesn't even compile ;)
>
> The build failure was:
> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c:2292: error: 'adev' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c:2344: error: 'pl022_suspend' undeclared here
> (not in a function)
>
> The build failure appears e.g. for the u8500 and realview defconfig.
>
> LinuxVersion: linux next-20110826
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Thanks!
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-08-28 19:26 ` [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c Peter Huewe
2011-08-28 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-29 8:41 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2011-09-05 12:45 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-20 20:45 ` Linus Walleij
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2011-09-05 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: Russell King, Rafael J. Wysocki, spi-devel-general, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, Peter Huewe
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> wrote:
> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
> doesn't even compile ;)
Grant can you please apply this patch? Right now linux-next is
breaking because of this missing patch...
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-09-05 12:45 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2011-09-20 20:45 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-20 21:52 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2011-09-20 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: Russell King, Rafael J. Wysocki, spi-devel-general, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, Peter Huewe
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
>> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
>> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
>> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
>> doesn't even compile ;)
>
> Grant can you please apply this patch? Right now linux-next is
> breaking because of this missing patch...
Ping on this... ignore if it's been picked already.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-09-20 20:45 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2011-09-20 21:52 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-09-20 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Russell King, Rafael J. Wysocki, spi-devel-general, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, Peter Huewe
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:45:41PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
> >> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
> >> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
> >> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
> >> doesn't even compile ;)
> >
> > Grant can you please apply this patch? Right now linux-next is
> > breaking because of this missing patch...
>
> Ping on this... ignore if it's been picked already.
It's not a patch that went through my tree, so I cannot pick it up.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-09-20 20:45 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-20 21:52 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-09-21 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-21 15:54 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2011-09-21 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij
Cc: Grant Likely, Rafael J. Wysocki, spi-devel-general, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, Peter Huewe
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:45:41PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes a build error, introduced by commit (67fc8b9f, "PM: add
> >> runtime PM support to core Primecell driver") which unfortunately was a little
> >> bit incomplete and did contain a typo (11 instead of 22).
> >> I'm not sure how this patch could have been tested back then, if it
> >> doesn't even compile ;)
> >
> > Grant can you please apply this patch? Right now linux-next is
> > breaking because of this missing patch...
>
> Ping on this... ignore if it's been picked already.
Isn't it already fixed? I've had this in my tree for quite some time
(since 5th September) which should also be in linux-next.
b21c57c ARM: 7079/1: spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
612f2eb PM: add runtime PM support to MMCI
67fc8b9 PM: add runtime PM support to core Primecell driver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix builderror in spi-pl022.c
2011-09-21 13:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2011-09-21 15:54 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2011-09-21 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Grant Likely, Rafael J. Wysocki, spi-devel-general, linux-kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, Peter Huewe
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:45:41PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> > Grant can you please apply this patch? Right now linux-next is
>> > breaking because of this missing patch...
>>
>> Ping on this... ignore if it's been picked already.
>
> Isn't it already fixed? I've had this in my tree for quite some time
> (since 5th September) which should also be in linux-next.
It is, just wasn't getting my linux-next right after all the kernelorg
downtime.
Thanks Russell, and sorry for the fuzz.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread