* [PATCH 1/2] cgroup/kmemleak: Annotate alloc_page() for cgroup allocations
2011-09-30 1:43 [PATCH 3.1-rc8 0/2] Two false positives from debugging tools (lockdep, kmemleak) Jonathan Nieder
@ 2011-09-30 1:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-09-30 1:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] epoll: fix spurious lockdep warnings Jonathan Nieder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-09-30 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Nelson Elhage, Steven Rostedt,
Catalin Marinas
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:19:16 -0400
When the cgroup base was allocated with kmalloc, it was necessary to
annotate the variable with kmemleak_not_leak(). But because it has
recently been changed to be allocated with alloc_page() (which skips
kmemleak checks) causes a warning on boot up.
I was triggering this output:
allocated 8388608 bytes of page_cgroup
please try 'cgroup_disable=memory' option if you don't want memory cgroups
kmemleak: Trying to color unknown object at 0xf5840000 as Grey
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.0.0-test #12
Call Trace:
[<c17e34e6>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f^M
[<c10e2941>] paint_ptr+0x4f/0x78
[<c178ab57>] kmemleak_not_leak+0x58/0x7d
[<c108ae9f>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x9/0x7d
[<c1cdb462>] kmemleak_init+0x19d/0x1e9
[<c1cbf771>] start_kernel+0x346/0x3ec
[<c1cbf1b4>] ? loglevel+0x18/0x18
[<c1cbf0aa>] i386_start_kernel+0xaa/0xb0
After a bit of debugging I tracked the object 0xf840000 (and others)
down to the cgroup code. The change from allocating base with kmalloc to
alloc_page() has the base not calling kmemleak_alloc() which adds the
pointer to the object_tree_root, but kmemleak_not_leak() adds it to the
crt_early_log[] table. On kmemleak_init(), the entry is found in the
early_log[] but not the object_tree_root, and this error message is
displayed.
If alloc_page() fails then it defaults back to vmalloc() which still
uses the kmemleak_alloc() which makes us still need the
kmemleak_not_leak() call. The solution is to call the kmemleak_alloc()
directly if the alloc_page() succeeds.
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
---
This patch is taken from [1]. The only change I made is to correct
"kmemcheck" above to "kmemleak" as suggested by Catalin. Seems to
work ok. :)
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1171696/focus=1178619
mm/page_cgroup.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
index 39d216d535ea..95e564cfe788 100644
--- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ struct page *lookup_cgroup_page(struct page_cgroup *pc)
static void *__meminit alloc_page_cgroup(size_t size, int nid)
{
void *addr = NULL;
+ gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
- addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
- if (addr)
+ addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, flags);
+ if (addr) {
+ kmemleak_alloc(addr, size, 1, flags);
return addr;
+ }
if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
addr = vmalloc_node(size, nid);
--
1.7.7.rc1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] epoll: fix spurious lockdep warnings
2011-09-30 1:43 [PATCH 3.1-rc8 0/2] Two false positives from debugging tools (lockdep, kmemleak) Jonathan Nieder
2011-09-30 1:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup/kmemleak: Annotate alloc_page() for cgroup allocations Jonathan Nieder
@ 2011-09-30 1:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-09-30 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Nelson Elhage, Steven Rostedt,
Catalin Marinas, Dave Jones, Davide Libenzi
From: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:50:51 +1000
epoll can acquire recursively acquire ep->mtx on multiple "struct
eventpoll"s at once in the case where one epoll fd is monitoring another
epoll fd. This is perfectly OK, since we're careful about the lock
ordering, but it causes spurious lockdep warnings. Annotate the recursion
using mutex_lock_nested, and add a comment explaining the nesting rules
for good measure.
Recent versions of systemd are triggering this, and it can also be
demonstrated with the following trivial test program:
int main(void) {
int e1, e2;
struct epoll_event evt = {
.events = EPOLLIN
};
e1 = epoll_create1(0);
e2 = epoll_create1(0);
epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt);
return 0;
}
Reported-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Tested-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com>
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
---
Taken from <git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git> (and I believe
Stephen got it from akpm's quilt queue somehow. The patch seems to
have visited the list at [1] and then gone silent. :) Anyway, it has
also been working well for me.
Thanks for reading.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1177210
fs/eventpoll.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index fe047d966dc5..2d1744ab5bcb 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -70,6 +70,15 @@
* simultaneous inserts (A into B and B into A) from racing and
* constructing a cycle without either insert observing that it is
* going to.
+ * It is necessary to acquire multiple "ep->mtx"es at once in the
+ * case when one epoll fd is added to another. In this case, we
+ * always acquire the locks in the order of nesting (i.e. after
+ * epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2), e1->mtx will always be acquired
+ * before e2->mtx). Since we disallow cycles of epoll file
+ * descriptors, this ensures that the mutexes are well-ordered. In
+ * order to communicate this nesting to lockdep, when walking a tree
+ * of epoll file descriptors, we use the current recursion depth as
+ * the lockdep subkey.
* It is possible to drop the "ep->mtx" and to use the global
* mutex "epmutex" (together with "ep->lock") to have it working,
* but having "ep->mtx" will make the interface more scalable.
@@ -464,13 +473,15 @@ static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
* @ep: Pointer to the epoll private data structure.
* @sproc: Pointer to the scan callback.
* @priv: Private opaque data passed to the @sproc callback.
+ * @depth: The current depth of recursive f_op->poll calls.
*
* Returns: The same integer error code returned by the @sproc callback.
*/
static int ep_scan_ready_list(struct eventpoll *ep,
int (*sproc)(struct eventpoll *,
struct list_head *, void *),
- void *priv)
+ void *priv,
+ int depth)
{
int error, pwake = 0;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -481,7 +492,7 @@ static int ep_scan_ready_list(struct eventpoll *ep,
* We need to lock this because we could be hit by
* eventpoll_release_file() and epoll_ctl().
*/
- mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, depth);
/*
* Steal the ready list, and re-init the original one to the
@@ -670,7 +681,7 @@ static int ep_read_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
static int ep_poll_readyevents_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
{
- return ep_scan_ready_list(priv, ep_read_events_proc, NULL);
+ return ep_scan_ready_list(priv, ep_read_events_proc, NULL, call_nests + 1);
}
static unsigned int ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
@@ -737,7 +748,7 @@ void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
ep = epi->ep;
list_del_init(&epi->fllink);
- mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
}
@@ -1134,7 +1145,7 @@ static int ep_send_events(struct eventpoll *ep,
esed.maxevents = maxevents;
esed.events = events;
- return ep_scan_ready_list(ep, ep_send_events_proc, &esed);
+ return ep_scan_ready_list(ep, ep_send_events_proc, &esed, 0);
}
static inline struct timespec ep_set_mstimeout(long ms)
@@ -1267,7 +1278,7 @@ static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi;
- mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, call_nests + 1);
for (rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
if (unlikely(is_file_epoll(epi->ffd.file))) {
@@ -1409,7 +1420,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(epoll_ctl, int, epfd, int, op, int, fd,
}
- mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
/*
* Try to lookup the file inside our RB tree, Since we grabbed "mtx"
--
1.7.7.rc1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread