From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM / QoS: Add function dev_pm_qos_read_value() (v2)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:46:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109301846.41364.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuV4ccJvJg-zCrhVXJKmHkEYLLQh032=BMh7qH27bTK5uQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, September 30, 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, September 29, 2011, Jean Pihet wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> I have a few minor remarks, inlined below.
> >
> > In the meantime it turned out that the patch caused a build failure
> > for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unset (your original patches won't really work
> > in this case too), so I posted a patch to fix it. However, since
> > you had remarks anyway, I've simply folded the fix into the next
> > version of the $subject patch, which is appended.
> OK to me.
>
> I have 2 remarks though:
> - some drivers are using the power_state field in the suspend/resume
> operation, IIUC without conflict. Can you confirm?
Yes, I can. There are no conflicts.
> - the power_state field is scheduled for removal, cf.
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt. That does not look
> correct.
It still is schediled for removal, but we can't remove it right now
anyway because of the users mentioned above. I'll replace this field
with a one-bit flag when we're ready to drop it (some time in future).
Thanks,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-30 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 22:17 [PATCH 0/5] PM: Generic PM domains and device PM QoS Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] PM / Domains: Split device PM domain data into base and need_restore Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] PM / Runtime: Do not run callbacks under lock for power.irq_safe set Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-12 8:26 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-12 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201109122344.02386.rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-09-13 1:22 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-13 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-14 1:12 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-14 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-15 10:55 ` Ming Lei
2011-08-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] PM / QoS: Add function dev_pm_qos_read_value() Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-01 15:13 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-01 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-02 6:49 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-03 8:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-05 7:51 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-05 15:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-05 7:44 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-30 22:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] PM / Domains: Add device stop governor function Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 22:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] PM / Domains: Add default power off " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-01 15:17 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-01 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-01 15:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] PM: Generic PM domains and device PM QoS Jean Pihet
2011-09-01 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-24 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/3] PM: Runtime PM and device PM QoS refinements Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-24 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / Domains: Split device PM domain data into base and need_restore Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-24 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / Runtime: Don't run callbacks under lock for power.irq_safe set Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-25 8:24 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-26 23:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-27 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-27 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-29 0:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-24 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] PM / QoS: Add function dev_pm_qos_read_value() (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-29 8:11 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-29 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-30 8:08 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-30 16:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109301846.41364.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome