From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
arve@android.com, markgross@thegnar.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
amit.kucheria@linaro.org, farrowg@sg.ibm.com,
"Dmitry Fink (Palm GBU)" <Dmitry.Fink@palm.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com,
Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>,
mjg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] [RFC] rtc: rtc-cmos: Add pm_stay_awake/pm_relax calls around IRQ
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:31:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111002083151.7b3ca70c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317064434-1829-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2489 bytes --]
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:13:51 -0700 John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> Flag the rtc-cmos IRQ event as a wakeup event using pm_stay_awake
> and pm_relax()
It seems that only the 0/6 patch in this sequence was given any attention.
However it appears to me that 3, 4, and 5 stand on their own and are clearly
bug-fixes - the bug being that the wake-up event generated by the CMOS rtc is
not being counted as a wakeup event by the power core.
I'm less clear on 5, but that is probably simply that I don't understand this
code very well yet.
So maybe resend 4,5,6 by themselves and get them accepted? Or maybe Rafael
could just pick them up and review/apply them as they are ???
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> CC: arve@android.com
> CC: markgross@thegnar.org
> CC: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> CC: amit.kucheria@linaro.org
> CC: farrowg@sg.ibm.com
> CC: Dmitry Fink (Palm GBU) <Dmitry.Fink@palm.com>
> CC: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
> CC: khilman@ti.com
> CC: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> CC: mjg@redhat.com
> CC: peterz@infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> index 05beb6c..1cc4688 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> @@ -538,11 +538,15 @@ static struct bin_attribute nvram = {
>
> static struct cmos_rtc cmos_rtc;
>
> +static struct wakeup_source *rtc_cmos_wakelock;
> +
> static irqreturn_t cmos_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
> {
> u8 irqstat;
> u8 rtc_control;
>
> + __pm_stay_awake(rtc_cmos_wakelock);
> +
> spin_lock(&rtc_lock);
>
> /* When the HPET interrupt handler calls us, the interrupt
> @@ -573,9 +577,12 @@ static irqreturn_t cmos_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
>
> if (is_intr(irqstat)) {
> rtc_update_irq(p, 1, irqstat);
> + __pm_relax(rtc_cmos_wakelock);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> - } else
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> + __pm_relax(rtc_cmos_wakelock);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> @@ -1153,6 +1160,8 @@ static int __init cmos_init(void)
> {
> int retval = 0;
>
> + rtc_cmos_wakelock = wakeup_source_register("rtc_cmos");
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> retval = pnp_register_driver(&cmos_pnp_driver);
> if (retval == 0)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-01 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-26 19:13 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] [RFC] suspend: Block suspend when wakeups are in-progress John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] [RFC] sched: Add support for SCHED_STAYAWAKE flag John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] [RFC] rtc: rtc-cmos: Add pm_stay_awake/pm_relax calls around IRQ John Stultz
2011-10-01 21:31 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] [RFC] rtc: interface: Add pm_stay_awake/pm_relax chaining rtc workqueue processing John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] [RFC] alarmtimer: Add pm_stay_awake /pm_relax calls John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] alarmtimer: Deboost on nanosleep John Stultz
2011-09-26 20:16 ` [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-26 22:27 ` John Stultz
2011-09-27 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-27 22:56 ` John Stultz
2011-09-28 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 7:57 ` Richard Cochran
2011-09-28 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 3:07 ` John Stultz
2011-09-28 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 3:27 ` John Stultz
2011-09-28 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 3:45 ` John Stultz
2011-09-28 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 10:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-09-28 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-28 0:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-28 1:19 ` John Stultz
2011-09-28 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111002083151.7b3ca70c@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Dmitry.Fink@palm.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=damm@opensource.se \
--cc=farrowg@sg.ibm.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome