From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm00@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
hongjiu.lu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:03:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003150345.GP16720@zod.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110031651400.31654@pobox.suse.cz>
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:53:34PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > Perhaps another check here for randomize? Something like:
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> > if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> > load_bias = 0;
> > else if (vaddr)
> > load_bias = 0;
> > else
> > load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE);
> > #else
> > load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
> > #endif
> >
> > If that's stupid, then feel free to tell me. I won't pretend like I
> > understand what is going on here yet, but based on the explanation you
> > provided that might work.
>
> I have just verified my hunch that the original patch from H.J. / Josh
> breaks ASLR completely, so Andrew, please drop it for now.
Yes, please drop the original.
> I am now looking into how to fix things properly.
>
> Josh, looking at what you are proposing -- do you see any reason to make
> the behavior different in #else branch and in !(current->flags &
> PF_RANDOMIZE) case?
I was mostly just trying to adapt H.J.'s patch to account for the
PF_RANDOMIZE case. Looking at it a bit more, I'm not sure why they
would need to be different. H.J., do you recall why you made that
change originally?
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:53 Josh Boyer
2011-09-29 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-29 21:36 ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-09-30 0:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-30 2:16 ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:03 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2011-10-03 15:11 ` [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled) Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:42 ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 15:56 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-03 16:02 ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-10-03 16:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-03 21:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-03 22:06 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:10 ` [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:59 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111003150345.GP16720@zod.bos.redhat.com \
--to=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm00@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®