mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm00@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	hongjiu.lu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled)
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:56:21 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110031150470.9106@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110031709230.31654@pobox.suse.cz>

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> How about the patch below instead? It survives my testing, and I believe 
> it handles both cases properly.
> 
> Confirmation from the original bug reporter would obviously be a nice 
> bonus too :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
> 
> The case of address space randomization being disabled in runtime through
> randomize_va_space sysctl is not treated properly in load_elf_binary(),
> resulting in SIGKILL coming at exec() time for certain PIE-linked binaries
> in case the randomization has been disabled at runtime prior to calling
> exec().
> 
> Handle the randomize_va_space == 0 case the same way as if we were not
> supporting .text randomization at all.
> 
> Based on original patch by H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> and
> Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>

However I'd suggest a change to deal with style issues:

> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index dd0fdfc..bb11fe4 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  			 * might try to exec.  This is because the brk will
>  			 * follow the loader, and is not movable.  */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> -			load_bias = 0;
> +			if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> +				load_bias = 0;
> +			else
> +				load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
>  #else
>  			load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
>  #endif

What about this instead, saving 3 lines out of 8:

			load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
			if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
				load_bias = 0;
#endif


?


Nicolas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-03 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-29 19:53 [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled Josh Boyer
2011-09-29 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-29 21:36   ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-09-30  0:41   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-30  2:16     ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 14:53       ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:03         ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 15:11           ` [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled) Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:42             ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 15:56             ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2011-10-03 16:02               ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-10-03 16:13                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-03 21:14                 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:03             ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-03 22:06               ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:56                 ` [PATCH v3] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-08 22:35               ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:10 ` [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:59   ` Josh Boyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1110031150470.9106@xanadu.home \
    --to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm00@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®