From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm00@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
hongjiu.lu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled)
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:56:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110031150470.9106@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110031709230.31654@pobox.suse.cz>
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> How about the patch below instead? It survives my testing, and I believe
> it handles both cases properly.
>
> Confirmation from the original bug reporter would obviously be a nice
> bonus too :)
>
>
>
>
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE execution with randomization disabled
>
> The case of address space randomization being disabled in runtime through
> randomize_va_space sysctl is not treated properly in load_elf_binary(),
> resulting in SIGKILL coming at exec() time for certain PIE-linked binaries
> in case the randomization has been disabled at runtime prior to calling
> exec().
>
> Handle the randomize_va_space == 0 case the same way as if we were not
> supporting .text randomization at all.
>
> Based on original patch by H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> and
> Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
However I'd suggest a change to deal with style issues:
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index dd0fdfc..bb11fe4 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
> * might try to exec. This is because the brk will
> * follow the loader, and is not movable. */
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> - load_bias = 0;
> + if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
> + load_bias = 0;
> + else
> + load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
> #else
> load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
> #endif
What about this instead, saving 3 lines out of 8:
load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
load_bias = 0;
#endif
?
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:53 [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled Josh Boyer
2011-09-29 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-29 21:36 ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-09-30 0:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-30 2:16 ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:03 ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 15:11 ` [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled (was Re: [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled) Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 15:42 ` Josh Boyer
2011-10-03 15:56 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2011-10-03 16:02 ` Lu, Hongjiu
2011-10-03 16:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-10-03 21:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-03 22:06 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 22:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:10 ` [RFC PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix PIE execution with randomization disabled Jiri Kosina
2011-10-03 12:59 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1110031150470.9106@xanadu.home \
--to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm00@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®