From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:42:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209084245.GB14547@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322526332-14088-1-git-send-email-jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:25:32AM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> However, the result of cpufreq_scale() differs from that of
> (re)calibrate_delay() by ca. 6%, i.e., 70.40 vs. 74.54. Please advise if
> this approximation is acceptable.
You don't say which figure is what.
Note that calibrate_delay() is itself inaccurate - the loops_per_jiffy
is the number of loops which can be executed between two timer ticks
_minus_ the time to process the timer interrupt itself. So, it's
actually always a little less than the theoretical number of loops
within that time period.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-27 3:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-28 22:00 ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-30 20:57 ` [PATCH 2a/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: select clock rate by CPU type Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-30 22:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 10:10 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 18:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:54 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-09 1:51 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Set the omap1623 sram size to 16K Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <201112010310.43890.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
[not found] ` <20111201022750.GY13928@atomide.com>
2011-12-01 9:54 ` [PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 10:21 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 17:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 18:38 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 19:23 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 19:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-01 20:30 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 21:16 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP1: Update dpll1 default rate reprogramming method Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-02 2:09 ` [PATCH 0/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming related issues Tony Lindgren
2011-12-02 17:02 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-01 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix ckctl value used for dpll1 defualt rate Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP1: Fix dpll1 reprogramming not actually allowed Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 17:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] init/calibrate.c: allow for recalibration of loops per jiffy Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-28 15:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-28 22:30 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-27 3:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP1: recalibrate loops per jiffy after dpll1 reprogram Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-11-29 0:25 ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] ARM: OMAP1: recalculate " Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 8:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-12-09 10:00 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-09 10:09 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-12-10 0:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-10 12:04 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209084245.GB14547@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®