From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: BSP or CPU0 online/offline
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111215185707.GA12654@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F075501A4A62498@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
* Yu, Fenghua <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> > We need a debug feature for this:
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_CPU_OFF=y or such (disabled by default):
> > this feature would offline the boot CPU as soon as possible,
> > and boot up userspace with the boot CPU offlined.
>
> I would think the earliest time when CPU0 can be offline is
> right after do_initcalls() because do_initcalls() installs
> some cpu hotplug notifier.
>
> But this will change generic code (e.g. add arch hook in
> init/main.c or add a new initcall level which is after level
> 7s).
>
> Another way is to offline CPU0 (or any CPU) in /etc/rc.local.
> By this way, we don't change kernel. And this is safe, but a
> bit later than in kernel.
>
> Any comment?
I think we should try to do this in the kernel, to keep the
debug feature independent of user-space code. This also helps
us clean init code from boot CPU assumptions.
Not sure we need a new initlevel - why not just offline the CPU?
I suspect the cpu hotplug notifier installation that is done in
do_initcalls() should be moved earlier so that the boot CPU can
be offlined as early as a secondary CPU is up and running.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-15 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-12 5:26 Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/topology.c: Support functions for BSP online/offline Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] x86/common.c: Init BSP data during BSP online Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] x86/mtrr/main.c: Ask the first online CPU to save mtrr Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] x86/smpboot.c: Don't offline BSP if any irq can not be migrated out of it Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] Documentations/cpu-hotplug.tx, kernel-parameters.txt: Add x86 CPU0 online/offline feature Fenghua Yu
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/i387.c: Thread xstate is initialized only on BSP once Fenghua Yu
2011-11-13 15:17 ` Brian Gerst
2011-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/power/cpu.c: Don't hibernate/suspend if CPU0 is offline Fenghua Yu
2011-12-06 8:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: BSP or CPU0 online/offline Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 9:52 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 10:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 11:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 13:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-06 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-07 0:04 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-12-07 0:15 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-12-07 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-07 17:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-07 22:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-08 0:53 ` Luck, Tony
2011-12-08 4:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 13:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-06 14:04 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 14:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-06 14:58 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2011-12-06 14:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-09 0:41 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-12-09 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-15 18:38 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-12-15 18:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111215185707.GA12654@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome