From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tags: fix use of parenthesis in regex
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:56:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224165602.6fe303d3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120225003411.GA27390@sepie.suse.cz>
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:34:12 +0100
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:15:43PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Several of the regular expressions passed to etags and ctags where incorrect
> > and missing the backslash before the closing paren, and matching the wrong
> > part of the start of the function causing warning:
> > etags: Unmatched ( or \( while compiling pattern
>
> But your patch introduces another imbalances, e.g.
>
>
> > @@ -129,31 +129,31 @@ exuberant()
> ...
> > - --regex-c++='/^TRACE_EVENT\(([^,)]*).*/trace_\1/' \
> ...
> > + --regex-c++='/^TRACE_EVENT(\([^,)]*\).*/trace_\1/' \
>
> The old version had left paren, start of group, ..., end of group
> The new version has start of group, left paren, ..., right paren
>
> Where left / right paren means the character without any special
> meaning. I actually can't see anything wrong with the old TRACE_EVENT matching, the regular expression is correct and I think it does what it should do (turn
> TRACE_EVENT(foo) into trace_foo).
>
> Below is the full list of warnings I get from
>
> Exuberant Ctags 5.8, Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Darren Hiebert
> Addresses: <dhiebert@users.sourceforge.net>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net
> Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex
>
>
> GEN tags
> ctags: Warning: regcomp ^SYSCALL_DEFINE[[:digit:]]?(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp ^TRACE_EVENT(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp ^DEFINE_EVENT\([^,)]*, *([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp PAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp PAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp PAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTSETFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTPAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp SETPAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __SETPAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTCLEARFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __TESTCLEARFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp CLEARPAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __CLEARPAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __PAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __PAGEFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp PAGEFLAG_FALSE(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTSCFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTSCFLAG(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp SETPAGEFLAG_NOOP(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp CLEARPAGEFLAG_NOOP(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __CLEARPAGEFLAG_NOOP(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp TESTCLEARFLAG_FALSE(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
> ctags: Warning: regcomp __TESTCLEARFLAG_FALSE(\([^,)]*\).*: Unmatched ( or \(
>
> The same list repeats, as ctags is called multiple times.
>
> Michal
The problem is that in proper regex each start of sub-expression \(
needs to have a matching end of sub-expression \)
The old version had no matching-end of sub-expression and therefore was technically
malformed, probably old tools just ignored it.
--regex='/PAGEFLAG\(([^,)]*).*/Page\1/'
^
start but no end?
My initial patch just fixed those, but others kept wanting more.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-25 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-03 19:27 [PATCH] tags: fix regex passed to etags Stephen Hemminger
2012-02-03 19:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 20:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-02-06 20:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-06 20:40 ` [PATCH] tags: fix regex passed to etags and ctags Stephen Hemminger
2012-02-06 23:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-06 23:15 ` [PATCH] tags: fix use of parenthesis in regex Stephen Hemminger
2012-02-07 19:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-25 0:34 ` Michal Marek
2012-02-25 0:56 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2012-02-25 9:37 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224165602.6fe303d3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome