From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "Matt Helsley" <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
"Linux PM list" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
markgross@thegnar.org, "Matthew Garrett" <mjg@redhat.com>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Brian Swetland" <swetland@google.com>,
"Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] Input / PM: Add ioctl to block suspend while event queue is not empty
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:18:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120227221831.GF7666@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201202262157.18496.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:57:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 24, 2012, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:34:58AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
> > >
> > > Add a new ioctl, EVIOCSWAKEUPSRC, to attach a wakeup source object to
> > > an evdev client event queue, such that it will be active whenever the
> > > queue is not empty. Then, all events in the queue will be regarded
> > > as wakeup events in progress and pm_get_wakeup_count() will block (or
> > > return false if woken up by a signal) until they are removed from the
> > > queue. In consequence, if the checking of wakeup events is enabled
> > > (e.g. throught the /sys/power/wakeup_count interface), the system
> > > won't be able to go into a sleep state until the queue is empty.
> > >
> > > This allows user space processes to handle situations in which they
> > > want to do a select() on an evdev descriptor, so they go to sleep
> > > until there are some events to read from the device's queue, and then
> > > they don't want the system to go into a sleep state until all the
> > > events are read (presumably for further processing). Of course, if
> > > they don't want the system to go into a sleep state _after_ all the
> > > events have been read from the queue, they have to use a separate
> > > mechanism that will prevent the system from doing that and it has
> > > to be activated before reading the first event (that also may be the
> > > last one).
> >
> > I haven't seen this idea mentioned before but I must admit I haven't
> > been following this thread too closely so apologies (and don't bother
> > rehashing) if it has:
> >
> > Could you just add this to epoll so that any fd userspace chooses would be
> > capable of doing this without introducing potentially ecclectic ioctl
> > interfaces?
> >
> > struct epoll_event ev;
> >
> > epfd = epoll_create1(EPOLL_STAY_AWAKE_SET);
> > ev.data.ptr = foo;
> > epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, fd, &ev);
> >
> > Which could be useful because you can put one epollfd in another's epoll
> > set. Or maybe as an EPOLLKEEPAWAKE flag in the event struct sort of like
> > EPOLLET:
> >
> > epfd = epoll_create1(0);
> > ev.events = EPOLLIN|EPOLLKEEPAWAKE;
> > epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, fd, &ev);
>
> Do you mean something like the patch below, or something different?
Yeah, this was sort of what I was thinking of. It nicely avoids the
ioctl() bits. I guess my only issue is the fop mimics the epoll
interface -- should it just be an fop to manage the file as a wakeup
source rather than a generic hook into epoll?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
>
> Rafael
>
> ---
> drivers/input/evdev.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/eventpoll.c | 15 +++++++++++-
> include/linux/eventpoll.h | 6 +++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 1
> 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1604,6 +1604,7 @@ struct file_operations {
> ssize_t (*aio_write) (struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *, unsigned long, loff_t);
> int (*readdir) (struct file *, void *, filldir_t);
> unsigned int (*poll) (struct file *, struct poll_table_struct *);
> + void (*epoll_ctl) (struct file *, int, unsigned int);
> long (*unlocked_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
> long (*compat_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
> int (*mmap) (struct file *, struct vm_area_struct *);
> Index: linux/fs/eventpoll.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ linux/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -609,6 +609,10 @@ static int ep_remove(struct eventpoll *e
> unsigned long flags;
> struct file *file = epi->ffd.file;
>
> + /* Notify the underlying driver that the polling has completed */
> + if (file->f_op->epoll_ctl)
> + file->f_op->epoll_ctl(file, EPOLL_CTL_DEL, epi->event.events);
> +
> /*
> * Removes poll wait queue hooks. We _have_ to do this without holding
> * the "ep->lock" otherwise a deadlock might occur. This because of the
> @@ -1094,6 +1098,10 @@ static int ep_insert(struct eventpoll *e
> epq.epi = epi;
> init_poll_funcptr(&epq.pt, ep_ptable_queue_proc);
>
> + /* Notify the underlying driver that we want to poll it */
> + if (tfile->f_op->epoll_ctl)
> + tfile->f_op->epoll_ctl(tfile, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, event->events);
> +
> /*
> * Attach the item to the poll hooks and get current event bits.
> * We can safely use the file* here because its usage count has
> @@ -1185,6 +1193,7 @@ error_unregister:
> */
> static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, struct epoll_event *event)
> {
> + struct file *file = epi->ffd.file;
> int pwake = 0;
> unsigned int revents;
>
> @@ -1196,11 +1205,15 @@ static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *e
> epi->event.events = event->events;
> epi->event.data = event->data; /* protected by mtx */
>
> + /* Notify the underlying driver of the change */
> + if (file->f_op->epoll_ctl)
> + file->f_op->epoll_ctl(file, EPOLL_CTL_MOD, event->events);
> +
> /*
> * Get current event bits. We can safely use the file* here because
> * its usage count has been increased by the caller of this function.
> */
> - revents = epi->ffd.file->f_op->poll(epi->ffd.file, NULL);
> + revents = file->f_op->poll(file, NULL);
>
> /*
> * If the item is "hot" and it is not registered inside the ready
> Index: linux/drivers/input/evdev.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/input/evdev.c
> +++ linux/drivers/input/evdev.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #define EVDEV_BUF_PACKETS 8
>
> #include <linux/poll.h>
> +#include <linux/eventpoll.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct evdev_client {
> unsigned int tail;
> unsigned int packet_head; /* [future] position of the first element of next packet */
> spinlock_t buffer_lock; /* protects access to buffer, head and tail */
> + struct wakeup_source *wakeup_source;
> struct fasync_struct *fasync;
> struct evdev *evdev;
> struct list_head node;
> @@ -75,10 +77,12 @@ static void evdev_pass_event(struct evde
> client->buffer[client->tail].value = 0;
>
> client->packet_head = client->tail;
> + __pm_relax(client->wakeup_source);
> }
>
> if (event->type == EV_SYN && event->code == SYN_REPORT) {
> client->packet_head = client->head;
> + __pm_stay_awake(client->wakeup_source);
> kill_fasync(&client->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
> }
>
> @@ -255,6 +259,8 @@ static int evdev_release(struct inode *i
> mutex_unlock(&evdev->mutex);
>
> evdev_detach_client(evdev, client);
> + wakeup_source_unregister(client->wakeup_source);
> +
> kfree(client);
>
> evdev_close_device(evdev);
> @@ -373,6 +379,8 @@ static int evdev_fetch_next_event(struct
> if (have_event) {
> *event = client->buffer[client->tail++];
> client->tail &= client->bufsize - 1;
> + if (client->packet_head == client->tail)
> + __pm_relax(client->wakeup_source);
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&client->buffer_lock);
> @@ -433,6 +441,52 @@ static unsigned int evdev_poll(struct fi
> return mask;
> }
>
> +static void evdev_client_attach_wakeup_source(struct evdev_client *client)
> +{
> + struct wakeup_source *ws;
> +
> + ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(&client->evdev->dev));
> + spin_lock_irq(&client->buffer_lock);
> + client->wakeup_source = ws;
> + if (client->packet_head != client->tail)
> + __pm_stay_awake(client->wakeup_source);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&client->buffer_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void evdev_client_detach_wakeup_source(struct evdev_client *client)
> +{
> + struct wakeup_source *ws;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&client->buffer_lock);
> + ws = client->wakeup_source;
> + client->wakeup_source = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&client->buffer_lock);
> + wakeup_source_unregister(ws);
> +}
> +
> +static void evdev_epoll_ctl(struct file *file, int op,
> + unsigned int events)
> +{
> + struct evdev_client *client = file->private_data;
> +
> + switch (op) {
> + case EPOLL_CTL_ADD:
> + if ((events & EPOLLWAKEUP) && !client->wakeup_source)
> + evdev_client_attach_wakeup_source(client);
> + break;
> + case EPOLL_CTL_DEL:
> + if (events & EPOLLWAKEUP)
> + evdev_client_detach_wakeup_source(client);
> + break;
> + case EPOLL_CTL_MOD:
> + /* 'events' is the new events mask (after the change) */
> + if ((events & EPOLLWAKEUP) && !client->wakeup_source)
> + evdev_client_attach_wakeup_source(client);
> + else if (!(events & EPOLLWAKEUP))
> + evdev_client_detach_wakeup_source(client);
> + }
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>
> #define BITS_PER_LONG_COMPAT (sizeof(compat_long_t) * 8)
> @@ -845,6 +899,7 @@ static const struct file_operations evde
> .read = evdev_read,
> .write = evdev_write,
> .poll = evdev_poll,
> + .epoll_ctl = evdev_epoll_ctl,
> .open = evdev_open,
> .release = evdev_release,
> .unlocked_ioctl = evdev_ioctl,
> Index: linux/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
> #define EPOLL_CTL_DEL 2
> #define EPOLL_CTL_MOD 3
>
> +/*
> + * Request the handling of system wakeup events so as to prevent automatic
> + * system suspends from happening while those events are being processed.
> + */
> +#define EPOLLWAKEUP (1 << 29)
> +
> /* Set the One Shot behaviour for the target file descriptor */
> #define EPOLLONESHOT (1 << 30)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 1:00 [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks" Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / Sleep: Initialize wakeup source locks in wakeup_source_add() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 22:29 ` John Stultz
2012-02-07 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / Sleep: Do not check wakeup too often in try_to_freeze_tasks() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] PM / Sleep: Look for wakeup events in later stages of device suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] PM / Sleep: Use wait queue to signal "no wakeup events in progress" Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-08 23:10 ` NeilBrown
2012-02-09 0:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-12 1:27 ` mark gross
2012-02-07 1:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] PM / Sleep: Change wakeup statistics Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-15 6:15 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-15 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-17 2:11 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-07 1:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] PM / Sleep: Implement opportunistic sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 22:49 ` [Update][RFC][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] PM / Sleep: Add "prevent autosleep time" statistics to wakeup sources Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 1:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks" Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-08 23:57 ` NeilBrown
2012-02-10 0:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-12 2:05 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-14 0:11 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-15 15:28 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 1:54 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 1:19 ` mark gross
2012-02-14 2:07 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-14 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-15 5:57 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-15 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-17 3:56 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-17 23:02 ` [PATCH] PM / Sleep: Add more wakeup source initialization routines Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-18 23:50 ` [Update][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-20 23:04 ` [Update 2x][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-17 3:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks" Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-17 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks", take 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] PM / Sleep: Look for wakeup events in later stages of device suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] PM / Sleep: Use wait queue to signal "no wakeup events in progress" Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] PM / Sleep: Change wakeup source statistics to follow Android Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] Input / PM: Add ioctl to block suspend while event queue is not empty Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-24 5:16 ` Matt Helsley
2012-02-25 4:25 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-25 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-28 0:19 ` Matt Helsley
2012-02-26 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-27 22:18 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2012-02-28 1:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-28 5:58 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-03-04 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 1:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] epoll: Add a flag, EPOLLWAKEUP, to prevent suspend while epoll events are ready Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-03-06 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / Sleep: Add wakeup_source_activate and wakeup_source_deactivate tracepoints Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-21 23:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] PM / Sleep: Implement opportunistic sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-22 8:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-22 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-23 5:35 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-21 23:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] PM / Sleep: Add "prevent autosleep time" statistics to wakeup sources Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 23:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-22 4:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks", take 2 John Stultz
2012-02-22 8:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-22 22:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks", take2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-23 6:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-23 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-23 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-24 4:44 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-24 23:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-25 4:43 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-25 20:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-25 19:20 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-25 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-28 10:24 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-22 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks", take 3 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] PM / Sleep: Look for wakeup events in later stages of device suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] PM / Sleep: Use wait queue to signal "no wakeup events in progress" Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23 4:01 ` mark gross
2012-04-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] PM / Sleep: Change wakeup source statistics to follow Android Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] PM / Sleep: Add wakeup_source_activate and wakeup_source_deactivate tracepoints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] epoll: Add a flag, EPOLLWAKEUP, to prevent suspend while epoll events are ready Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-26 4:03 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-26 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 3:49 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-04-27 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 23:26 ` [PATCH] " Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-04-30 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] " NeilBrown
2012-05-01 0:52 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-01 2:18 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-01 5:33 ` [PATCH] " Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-01 6:28 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-01 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-16 6:38 ` Michael Kerrisk
2012-07-16 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-16 22:04 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-07-17 5:14 ` Michael Kerrisk
2012-07-17 19:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 19:36 ` Greg KH
2012-07-17 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-18 6:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2012-04-22 21:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] PM / Sleep: Implement opportunistic sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-26 3:05 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-26 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 0:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-27 21:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 0:23 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-03 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 21:27 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-03 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 22:16 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-03 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] PM / Sleep: Add "prevent autosleep time" statistics to wakeup sources Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-22 21:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-24 1:35 ` John Stultz
2012-04-24 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-26 6:31 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-26 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 0:07 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-27 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 3:57 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-04-27 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-27 21:17 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-04-27 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 19:29 ` [PATCH 0/2]: Kconfig options for wakelocks limit and gc (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space ...) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Sleep: Make the limit of user space wakeup sources configurable Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / Sleep: User space wakeup sources garbage collector Kconfig option Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-03 22:14 ` [PATCH 0/2]: Kconfig options for wakelocks limit and gc (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space ...) Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-03 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-23 16:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8] PM: Implement autosleep and "wake locks", take 3 Greg KH
2012-04-23 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120227221831.GF7666@count0.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=swetland@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®