mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RT 11/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Use seqcount
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:16:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120306161947.277814493@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306161636.491172179@goodmis.org>

[-- Attachment #1: 0011-seqlock-Use-seqcount.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5639 bytes --]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No point in having different implementations for the same thing.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/linux/seqlock.h |  176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index b990f6e..3e1f3f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -30,81 +30,12 @@
 #include <linux/preempt.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
-typedef struct {
-	unsigned sequence;
-	spinlock_t lock;
-} seqlock_t;
-
-/*
- * These macros triggered gcc-3.x compile-time problems.  We think these are
- * OK now.  Be cautious.
- */
-#define __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
-		 { 0, __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) }
-
-#define seqlock_init(x)					\
-	do {						\
-		(x)->sequence = 0;			\
-		spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);		\
-	} while (0)
-
-#define DEFINE_SEQLOCK(x) \
-		seqlock_t x = __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(x)
-
-/* Lock out other writers and update the count.
- * Acts like a normal spin_lock/unlock.
- * Don't need preempt_disable() because that is in the spin_lock already.
- */
-static inline void write_seqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
-{
-	spin_lock(&sl->lock);
-	++sl->sequence;
-	smp_wmb();
-}
-
-static inline void write_sequnlock(seqlock_t *sl)
-{
-	smp_wmb();
-	sl->sequence++;
-	spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
-}
-
-/* Start of read calculation -- fetch last complete writer token */
-static __always_inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
-{
-	unsigned ret;
-
-repeat:
-	ret = ACCESS_ONCE(sl->sequence);
-	if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
-		cpu_relax();
-		goto repeat;
-	}
-	smp_rmb();
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * Test if reader processed invalid data.
- *
- * If sequence value changed then writer changed data while in section.
- */
-static __always_inline int read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
-{
-	smp_rmb();
-
-	return unlikely(sl->sequence != start);
-}
-
-
 /*
  * Version using sequence counter only.
  * This can be used when code has its own mutex protecting the
  * updating starting before the write_seqcountbeqin() and ending
  * after the write_seqcount_end().
  */
-
 typedef struct seqcount {
 	unsigned sequence;
 } seqcount_t;
@@ -186,7 +117,6 @@ static inline int __read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
 static inline int read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
 {
 	smp_rmb();
-
 	return __read_seqcount_retry(s, start);
 }
 
@@ -220,21 +150,101 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
 	s->sequence+=2;
 }
 
+typedef struct {
+	struct seqcount seqcount;
+	spinlock_t lock;
+} seqlock_t;
+
 /*
- * Possible sw/hw IRQ protected versions of the interfaces.
+ * These macros triggered gcc-3.x compile-time problems.  We think these are
+ * OK now.  Be cautious.
  */
+#define __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname)			\
+	{						\
+		.seqcount = SEQCNT_ZERO,		\
+		.lock =	__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname)	\
+	}
+
+#define seqlock_init(x)					\
+	do {						\
+		seqcount_init(&(x)->seqcount);		\
+		spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);		\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define DEFINE_SEQLOCK(x) \
+		seqlock_t x = __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(x)
+
+/*
+ * Read side functions for starting and finalizing a read side section.
+ */
+static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	return read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
+{
+	return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Lock out other writers and update the count.
+ * Acts like a normal spin_lock/unlock.
+ * Don't need preempt_disable() because that is in the spin_lock already.
+ */
+static inline void write_seqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	spin_lock(&sl->lock);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_sequnlock(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_seqlock_bh(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_sequnlock_bh(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_seqlock_irq(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	spin_lock_irq(&sl->lock);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_sequnlock_irq(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __write_seqlock_irqsave(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sl->lock, flags);
+	write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+	return flags;
+}
+
 #define write_seqlock_irqsave(lock, flags)				\
-	do { local_irq_save(flags); write_seqlock(lock); } while (0)
-#define write_seqlock_irq(lock)						\
-	do { local_irq_disable();   write_seqlock(lock); } while (0)
-#define write_seqlock_bh(lock)						\
-        do { local_bh_disable();    write_seqlock(lock); } while (0)
-
-#define write_sequnlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)				\
-	do { write_sequnlock(lock); local_irq_restore(flags); } while(0)
-#define write_sequnlock_irq(lock)					\
-	do { write_sequnlock(lock); local_irq_enable(); } while(0)
-#define write_sequnlock_bh(lock)					\
-	do { write_sequnlock(lock); local_bh_enable(); } while(0)
+	do { flags = __write_seqlock_irqsave(lock); } while (0)
+
+static inline void
+write_sequnlock_irqrestore(seqlock_t *sl, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sl->lock, flags);
+}
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_SEQLOCK_H */
-- 
1.7.8.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-06 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 16:16 [PATCH RT 00/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 release cycle Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 01/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-convert-xtime_lock-to-raw_seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 02/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-create-raw_seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 03/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-use-seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 04/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-remove-unused-functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 22:39   ` John Kacur
2012-03-06 22:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 05/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86-64-remove-vsyscall-number-3 Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 06/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86-64-emulate-legacy-vsyscalls Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 07/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86: vdso: Remove bogus locking in update_vsyscall_tz() Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 08/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 09/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] ia64: vsyscall: " Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 10/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Remove unused functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 12/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Provide seq_spin_* functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 13/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: fs_struct use seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 14/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: dentry " Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 15/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] timekeeping: Split xtime_lock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 16/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Prevent rt starvation Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 17/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: Protect open coded isize seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 18/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] net: u64_stat: Protect seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 19/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] timer: Fix hotplug for -rt Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 20/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] futex/rt: Fix possible lockup when taking pi_lock in proxy handler Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 21/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] ring-buffer/rt: Check for irqs disabled before grabbing reader lock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 22/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] sched/rt: Fix wait_task_interactive() to test rt_spin_lock state Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 23/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] lglock/rt: Use non-rt for_each_cpu() in -rt code Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:17 ` [PATCH RT 24/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] cpu: Make hotplug.lock a "sleeping" spinlock on RT Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:17 ` [PATCH RT 25/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] Linux 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 22:20 ` [PATCH RT 00/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 release cycle Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120306161947.277814493@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome