mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
	stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RT 24/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] cpu: Make hotplug.lock a "sleeping" spinlock on RT
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:17:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120306161952.267327135@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306161636.491172179@goodmis.org>

[-- Attachment #1: 0024-cpu-Make-hotplug.lock-a-sleeping-spinlock-on-RT.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3476 bytes --]

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Tasks can block on hotplug.lock in pin_current_cpu(), but their state
might be != RUNNING. So the mutex wakeup will set the state
unconditionally to RUNNING. That might cause spurious unexpected
wakeups. We could provide a state preserving mutex_lock() function,
but this is semantically backwards. So instead we convert the
hotplug.lock() to a spinlock for RT, which has the state preserving
semantics already.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1330702617.25686.265.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/cpu.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index b2de274..21c8380 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -46,7 +46,12 @@ static int cpu_hotplug_disabled;
 
 static struct {
 	struct task_struct *active_writer;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+	/* Makes the lock keep the task's state */
+	spinlock_t lock;
+#else
 	struct mutex lock; /* Synchronizes accesses to refcount, */
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * Also blocks the new readers during
 	 * an ongoing cpu hotplug operation.
@@ -54,10 +59,22 @@ static struct {
 	int refcount;
 } cpu_hotplug = {
 	.active_writer = NULL,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+	.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(cpu_hotplug.lock),
+#else
 	.lock = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(cpu_hotplug.lock),
+#endif
 	.refcount = 0,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+# define hotplug_lock() rt_spin_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
+# define hotplug_unlock() rt_spin_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
+#else
+# define hotplug_lock() mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
+# define hotplug_unlock() mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
+#endif
+
 struct hotplug_pcp {
 	struct task_struct *unplug;
 	int refcount;
@@ -87,8 +104,8 @@ retry:
 		return;
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
-	mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_lock();
+	hotplug_unlock();
 	preempt_disable();
 	goto retry;
 }
@@ -161,9 +178,9 @@ void get_online_cpus(void)
 	might_sleep();
 	if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
 		return;
-	mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_lock();
 	cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_unlock();
 
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_online_cpus);
@@ -172,10 +189,10 @@ void put_online_cpus(void)
 {
 	if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
 		return;
-	mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_lock();
 	if (!--cpu_hotplug.refcount && unlikely(cpu_hotplug.active_writer))
 		wake_up_process(cpu_hotplug.active_writer);
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_unlock();
 
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_online_cpus);
@@ -207,11 +224,11 @@ static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
 	cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;
 
 	for (;;) {
-		mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+		hotplug_lock();
 		if (likely(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
 			break;
 		__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+		hotplug_unlock();
 		schedule();
 	}
 }
@@ -219,7 +236,7 @@ static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
 static void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
 {
 	cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
-	mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+	hotplug_unlock();
 }
 
 #else /* #if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
-- 
1.7.8.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-06 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 16:16 [PATCH RT 00/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 release cycle Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 01/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-convert-xtime_lock-to-raw_seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 02/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-create-raw_seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 03/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-use-seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 04/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] revert-seqlock-remove-unused-functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 22:39   ` John Kacur
2012-03-06 22:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 05/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86-64-remove-vsyscall-number-3 Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 06/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86-64-emulate-legacy-vsyscalls Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 07/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86: vdso: Remove bogus locking in update_vsyscall_tz() Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 08/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 09/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] ia64: vsyscall: " Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 10/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Remove unused functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 11/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Use seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 12/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Provide seq_spin_* functions Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 13/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: fs_struct use seqlock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 14/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: dentry " Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 15/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] timekeeping: Split xtime_lock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 16/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] seqlock: Prevent rt starvation Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 17/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] fs: Protect open coded isize seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 18/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] net: u64_stat: Protect seqcount Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 19/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] timer: Fix hotplug for -rt Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 20/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] futex/rt: Fix possible lockup when taking pi_lock in proxy handler Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 21/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] ring-buffer/rt: Check for irqs disabled before grabbing reader lock Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 22/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] sched/rt: Fix wait_task_interactive() to test rt_spin_lock state Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:16 ` [PATCH RT 23/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] lglock/rt: Use non-rt for_each_cpu() in -rt code Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 16:17 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-03-06 16:17 ` [PATCH RT 25/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] Linux 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2012-03-06 22:20 ` [PATCH RT 00/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.23-rt39-rc1 release cycle Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120306161952.267327135@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome