From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
arekm@maven.pl, Jared <nitro@legroom.net>,
dilieto@lineone.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] Fix an old sky2 WOL regression
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:08:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120321080801.55e4731b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F69BE2E.7070903@t-online.de>
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:40:30 +0100
Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
> Sky2 Wake on LAN is broken since February 2010 on a number of systems.
> Yes. More than two years.
>
> We know about the problem and the cause since October 2010
> (Bugzilla bug #19492). It´s commit 87b09f1f25cd1e01d7c50bf423c7fe33027d7511.
>
> Stephen, David: You signed off that commit.
>
> Andrew: You called it a regression in October 2010.
>
> It has been proposed to revert the commit that caused the problem.
> Nothing happened.
>
> I proposed to re-establish the old code for dmi_match()ed systems.
> Without success.
>
> Now it is proposed to re-establish the old code as a configuration option.
> If nothing happens again I will propose a module parameter ;-)
>
> Stephen, I don´t want to be a pain in the neck, and it is not my intention
> to offend you by my "attitude". But I simply cannot understand why this
> know regression is not fixed. The bit we talk about is documented,
> and in fact it was set for a number of kernel versions unconditionally.
> Nobody complained about ruined hardware or minor problems.
>
> The systems affected are old enough that no manufacturer cares about
> them, but they are still quite usable for a lot of jobs (kernel 3.3 compile
> time here is below 15 minutes).
>
> If there is a problem in the kernel and if we do know an easy solution,
> that solution should be commited to the kernel, no matter what is written
> in some random documentation, no matter if we could blame some
> BIOS authors. That´s the way Linux works - at least I thought so.
>
> cu,
> Knut
Config options don't work for distro's.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-21 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 11:40 Knut Petersen
2012-03-21 15:08 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2012-03-21 15:32 ` [PATCH] sky2: override for PCI legacy power management Stephen Hemminger
2012-03-21 15:56 ` Knut Petersen
2012-03-21 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-03-21 20:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-03-21 20:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-03-22 22:36 ` Knut Petersen
2012-05-06 22:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-21 20:56 ` David Miller
2012-05-04 20:17 [REGRESSION][PATCH] Fix an old sky2 WOL regression dilieto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120321080801.55e4731b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arekm@maven.pl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dilieto@lineone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitro@legroom.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome