* Remove empty /proc/device-tree when no openfirmware exists.
@ 2012-05-14 16:41 Dave Jones
2013-12-17 15:55 ` Josh Boyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2012-05-14 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel; +Cc: Fedora Kernel Team, Al Viro, Paul Mackerras
distribution kernels might want to build in support for /proc/device-tree
for kernels that might end up running on hardware that doesn't support openfirmware.
This results in an empty /proc/device-tree existing.
Remove it if the OFW root node doesn't exist.
[This situation actually confuses grub2, resulting in install failures.
grub2 sees the /proc/device-tree and picks the wrong install target
cf. http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/grub/trunk/grub/annotate/4300/util/grub-install.in#L311
grub should be more robust, but still, leaving an empty proc dir seems pointless. ]
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index 927cbd1..f060f28 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ void __init proc_device_tree_init(void)
return;
root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
if (root == NULL) {
+ remove_proc_entry("device-tree", NULL);
pr_debug("/proc/device-tree: can't find root\n");
return;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Remove empty /proc/device-tree when no openfirmware exists.
2012-05-14 16:41 Remove empty /proc/device-tree when no openfirmware exists Dave Jones
@ 2013-12-17 15:55 ` Josh Boyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2013-12-17 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones, Linux Kernel, Al Viro, Paul Mackerras,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Andrew Morton
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> distribution kernels might want to build in support for /proc/device-tree
> for kernels that might end up running on hardware that doesn't support openfirmware.
> This results in an empty /proc/device-tree existing.
> Remove it if the OFW root node doesn't exist.
>
> [This situation actually confuses grub2, resulting in install failures.
> grub2 sees the /proc/device-tree and picks the wrong install target
> cf. http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/grub/trunk/grub/annotate/4300/util/grub-install.in#L311
> grub should be more robust, but still, leaving an empty proc dir seems pointless. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
We're still carrying this in Fedora for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818378 . Can we get this
upstream sometime soon?
josh
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> index 927cbd1..f060f28 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ void __init proc_device_tree_init(void)
> return;
> root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> if (root == NULL) {
> + remove_proc_entry("device-tree", NULL);
> pr_debug("/proc/device-tree: can't find root\n");
> return;
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-17 15:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-14 16:41 Remove empty /proc/device-tree when no openfirmware exists Dave Jones
2013-12-17 15:55 ` Josh Boyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome