mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	mroos@linux.ee, JBottomley@parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fix / cleanup async scsi scanning
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:22:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120530182239.GD15635@x1.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530182016.23574.11056.stgit@dwillia2-linux.jf.intel.com>

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:21:25AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Commit a7a20d10 "[SCSI] sd: limit the scope of the async probe domain"
> introduces a boot regression by moving sd probe work off of the global
> async queue.  Using a local async domain hides the probe work from being
> synchronized by wait_for_device_probe()->async_synchronize_full().
> 
> Fix this by teaching async_synchronize_full() to flush all async work
> regardless of domain, and take the opportunity to convert scsi scanning
> to async_schedule().  This enables wait_for_device_probe() to flush scsi
> scanning work.

Looks like those fix a similar boot issue I reported earlier:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133839683405526&w=2

Should I give them a run or are they still in review?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-30 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-30 18:21 Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] async: introduce 'async_domain' type Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] async: make async_synchronize_full() flush all work regardless of domain Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] scsi: queue async scan work to an async_schedule domain Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: cleanup usages of scsi_complete_async_scans Dan Williams
2012-05-30 21:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-30 21:49       ` Dan Williams
2012-05-30 18:22 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-05-30 18:29   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] fix / cleanup async scsi scanning Dan Williams
2012-05-30 22:33     ` walt
2012-05-31 13:37     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-31  9:05 ` mroos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120530182239.GD15635@x1.osrc.amd.com \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome