mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] uprobes: install_breakpoint() should fail if is_swbp_insn() == T
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:20:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120601172055.GA24798@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120601163315.GJ24279@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 06/01, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2012-06-01 17:53:12]:
>
> > But. Doesn't this mean we can greatly simplify register_for_each_vma()
> > and make it O(n) ?
> >
> > Unless I missed something, we can simply create the list of
> > mm/vaddr structures under ->i_mmap_mutex (vma_prio_tree_foreach), then
> > register_for_each_vma() can process the list and that is all.
>
>
> If I remember correctly, we cannot allocate the list elements under
> i_mmap_mutex. We dont know how many list elements to allocate.
>
> This is what Peter had to say : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/27/72
>
> "Because we try to take i_mmap_mutex during reclaim, trying to unmap
> pages. So suppose we do an allocation while holding i_mmap_mutex, find
> there's no free memory, try and unmap a page in order to free it, and
> we're stuck."

Yes, try_to_unmap.

But. What do you think about the pseudo-code below? Only to illustrate
the approach, the code is not complete.

In the "likely" case we do vma_prio_tree_foreach() twice, this is
better than the current quadratic behaviour.

Oleg.

struct map_info {
	struct map_info *next;
	struct mm_struct *mm;
	loff_t vaddr;
};

static struct map_info *
build_map_info_list(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t offset,
							bool is_register)
{
	struct map_info *prev = NULL;
	struct map_info *curr;
	int more;

again:
	more = 0;
	curr = NULL;
	vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
		struct map_info *info = prev;

		if (!valid_vma(vma, is_register))
			continue;

		if (!info) {
			more++;
			continue;
		}

		if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users))
			contunue;

		prev = info->next;

		info->mm = vma->vm_mm;
		info->vaddr = vma_address(vma, offset);

		info->next = curr;
		curr = info;
	}

	if (!more) {
		while (prev) {
			map_info *tmp = prev;
			prev = prev->next;
			kfree(tmp);
		}

		return curr;
	}

	prev = curr;

	while (curr) {
		mmput(curr->mm);
		curr = curr->next;
	}

	while (more--) {
		struct map_info *info = kmalloc(...);
		if (!info)
			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);	// MEMORY LEAK
		info->next = prev;
		prev = info;
	}

	goto again;
}


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-01 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-30 16:57 [PATCH 0/3] uprobes: misc minor changes Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] uprobes: install_breakpoint() should fail if is_swbp_insn() == T Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 17:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 17:37     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 17:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 17:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 18:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 18:04           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 18:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 18:53           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 15:53             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 16:33               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-01 17:20                 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-06-01 18:31                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-02 18:21                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-01 16:47             ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-01 18:38               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-31 12:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-31 12:54           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] uprobes: remove the unnecessary initialization in add_utask() Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] uprobes: simplify the usage of uprobe->pending_list Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 17:48   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-05-30 18:10     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-30 18:23       ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120601172055.GA24798@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome