From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/build change for v3.6
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:55:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726065506.GA8421@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120725201511.GA888@merkur.ravnborg.org>
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > No, the reason for the odd looking diff is that lots of lines in
> > arch/x86/Makefile have 8-space tabs for histerical reasons but
> > new code (such as this one) has proper tabs.
>
> Use of tabs for indent in a Makefile is just asking for
> trouble.
Ok, I guess you are right - see the patch below which was
another type of bug that could be introduced via not using
spaces properly.
We could do it the other way around: turn all tabs into spaces
and add Makefile checking in kbuild so that the build fails if
a tab is added to a Makefile?
Alternatively, is there perhaps some way to teach make to not be
so broken to depend on whitespace details that are *invisible*
to humans?
Thanks,
Ingo
Index: linux/arch/x86/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ linux/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
KBUILD_AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
else
- $(warning CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support)
+ $(warning CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support)
endif
endif
export CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-22 13:44 Ingo Molnar
2012-07-22 13:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-22 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-23 9:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-25 20:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-07-25 20:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-26 6:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-07-29 20:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120726065506.GA8421@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome