mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
	arve@android.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Folding Android's keyreset driver in sysRQ
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:08:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005190819.GB24356@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005195303.6e652997@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>

On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:53:03PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for
> > the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely
> > there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for
> > example, making it an empty weak symbol so that board code could
> > override it with strong one?
> 
> I have the same objection to it being passed in other weird ways. This is
> cross architecture, cross device stuff. Magic architecture goo and weak
> symbols are not the right solution.

The right solution is module option + DT. However they want to have
compatibility for older boards. For that I think weak symbol is just
fine.

> 
> The reset switch is a device, physically and logically.

Except that this one isn't. It is a magic sequence of key presses done
on a physical device that is already registered with the kernel. We do
not register SysRQ itself as a separate device, we do not register Mac
button mangler as a separate device, and I do not see the reason here
either.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-05 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-05 17:59 mathieu.poirier
2012-10-05 18:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-10-05 18:53   ` Alan Cox
2012-10-05 19:08     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2012-10-05 19:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2012-10-17  3:35     ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-10-20 16:38       ` Mathieu Poirier
2012-10-21  6:19       ` Dmitry Torokhov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-27 21:43 mathieu.poirier
2012-08-27 23:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-28 10:55   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121005190819.GB24356@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome