mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
To: Yong Ding <yongd@marvell.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Wilson Callan <wilson.callan@savantsystems.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Zhangfei Gao <zgao6@marvell.com>,
	Kevin Liu <kliu5@marvell.com>, Jialing Fu <jlfu@marvell.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:50:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121018054053.GA4513@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89813612683626448B837EE5A0B6A7CB30388601C9@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.com>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:01:40PM -0700, Yong Ding wrote:
> Shawn,
> Thanks for your comment. And sorry for my so late due to illness:-)
> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION is used for notifying we don't use the host internal card detection method so that we don't need enable/disable those relevant interrupt bits of host(sdhci_set_card_detection in sdhci.c). 
> And as I double-checked the latest kernel code, actually sdhci-esdhc-imx sets this flag by default, and then will clear it only when the detection type is ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER. So this aligns with my understanding. 

What I was saying is the bit will be cleared when the detection type is
ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLE or ESDHC_CD_GPIO.  You may have missed the fact that
there is no "break" in case ESDHC_CD_GPIO but a "fall through" comment.

        switch (boarddata->cd_type) {
        case ESDHC_CD_GPIO:
                err = gpio_request_one(boarddata->cd_gpio, GPIOF_IN, "ESDHC_CD");
                if (err) {
                        dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
                                "no card-detect pin available!\n");
                        goto no_card_detect_pin;
                }

                err = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(boarddata->cd_gpio), cd_irq,
                                 IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
                                 mmc_hostname(host->mmc), host);
                if (err) {
                        dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "request irq error\n");
                        goto no_card_detect_irq;
                }
                /* fall through */

        case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
                /* we have a working card_detect back */
                host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
                break;

        case ESDHC_CD_PERMANENT:
                host->mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
                break;

        case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
                break;
        }

Shawn

> What I want to do is that 1st we shall set MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL by our host driver itself and 2nd remove the improper logic in sdhci_add_host() . How do u think? Thanks.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-28 10:28 yongd
2012-09-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card by itself yongd
2012-10-07 14:06   ` Shawn Guo
2012-10-17  4:01     ` Yong Ding
2012-10-18  5:50       ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2012-10-18  6:27         ` Yong Ding
2012-10-18  6:38           ` Shawn Guo
2012-10-18  7:19             ` Yong Ding
2012-09-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-s3c: " yongd
2012-09-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: remove MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL setting in sdhci_add_host yongd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121018054053.GA4513@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net \
    --to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=dsd@laptop.org \
    --cc=jlfu@marvell.com \
    --cc=kliu5@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wilson.callan@savantsystems.com \
    --cc=yongd@marvell.com \
    --cc=zgao6@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®