From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: add event modifier to request exclusive PMU access
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121019155300.GD980@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBSVn+2OO14Y65n_Z+F3CvLSiF1zztpELJBPzhF3=DANXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:47:11PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:17:57PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:52 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> >> -modifier_event [ukhpGH]{1,8}
> >> >> +modifier_event [ukhpGHx]{1,8}
> >> >
> >> > wouldn't the max modifier sting length grow by adding another possible
> >> > modifier?
> >>
> >> That's what I thought too, but then I don't understand why it was at
> >> eight before and not
> >> seven: One instance of each letter, + a second for pp (precise=2). Or
> >> am I missing
> >> something here?
> >
> > hm, I think I assumed for some reason that 'ppp' is valid as well
> >
> If that's the case, then yes, I need to bump that number to 9.
found my source ;)
include/linux/perf_event.h:
...
/*
* precise_ip:
*
* 0 - SAMPLE_IP can have arbitrary skid
* 1 - SAMPLE_IP must have constant skid
* 2 - SAMPLE_IP requested to have 0 skid
* 3 - SAMPLE_IP must have 0 skid
*
* See also PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP
*/
precise_ip : 2, /* skid constraint */
...
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 14:52 [PATCH 0/2] perf: enforce exclusive PMU access for SNB INST_RETIRED:PREC_DIST Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: add event modifier to request exclusive PMU access Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 15:17 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 15:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-10-19 15:47 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 15:53 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2012-10-19 15:58 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-19 16:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-10-19 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: SNB exclusive PMU access for INST_RETIRED:PREC_DIST Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 15:49 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-19 15:58 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 16:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-19 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-21 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-21 17:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-21 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-22 11:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-10-24 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121019155300.GD980@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome