mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@start.ca>
Cc: "Mark Lord" <kernel@teksavvy.com>,
	"Stanislav Kinsbursky" <skinsbursky@parallels.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paweł Sikora" <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>,
	"Tom Horsley" <horsley1953@gmail.com>,
	"Jason Tibbitts" <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:23:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215192303.GD19923@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511BAAAA.9040804@start.ca>

svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list.  Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.

I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c |   15 ++-------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 5a9d40c..11a33c8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -863,7 +863,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
 	struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure;
 	struct svc_xprt *xprt;
 	struct list_head *le, *next;
-	LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged);
 
 	dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n");
 
@@ -884,25 +883,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
 		if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 ||
 		    test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags))
 			continue;
-		svc_xprt_get(xprt);
-		list_move(le, &to_be_aged);
+		list_del_init(le);
 		set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
 		set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
-
-	while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) {
-		le = to_be_aged.next;
-		/* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */
-		list_del_init(le);
-		xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list);
-
 		dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt);
 
 		/* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */
 		svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
-		svc_xprt_put(xprt);
 	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
 
 	mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ);
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 16:17 BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 Mark Lord
2013-01-14 20:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-15  4:16   ` Mark Lord
2013-01-15 20:56     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-16  5:20       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-16 22:51         ` Mark Lord
2013-01-16 22:58           ` Mark Lord
2013-01-17  5:05           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-17 13:03             ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-17 13:24               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-17 23:41                 ` Mark Lord
2013-01-18  5:37                   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-18 15:48                     ` Mark Lord
2013-01-18 15:56                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-21  8:19                         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-20 22:51                     ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 (another one) Mark Lord
2013-02-12 20:52                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-13 15:00                         ` Mark Lord
2013-02-15 19:22                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:42                             ` Tom Horsley
2013-02-15 19:46                               ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:23                           ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-02-15 19:23                             ` [PATCH 2/2] svcrpc: fix rpc server shutdown races J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:33                         ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 (another one) Paweł Sikora
2013-02-17 15:54                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-18  7:42                             ` Paweł Sikora
2013-01-17 13:11 ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 Mark Lord
2013-01-17 13:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-17 23:40     ` Mark Lord
2013-02-25 20:45     ` Mark Lord
2013-02-25 20:52       ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215192303.GD19923@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=horsley1953@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@start.ca \
    --cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawel.sikora@agmk.net \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=tibbs@math.uh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome