From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/acct.h
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:47:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130306204742.31327.46737.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130306204724.31327.43118.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
In the UAPI header files, __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN must be compared
against __BYTE_ORDER in preprocessor conditionals where these are exposed to
userspace (that is they're not inside __KERNEL__ conditionals).
However, in the main kernel the norm is to check for "defined(__XXX_ENDIAN)"
rather than comparing against __BYTE_ORDER and this has incorrectly leaked
into the userspace headers.
The definition of ACCT_BYTEORDER in linux/acct.h is wrong in this way. Note
that userspace will likely interpret this incorrectly as the big-endian variant
on little-endian machines - depending on header inclusion order.
[!!!] NOTE [!!!] This patch may adversely change the userspace API. It might
be better to fix the value of ACCT_BYTEORDER.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/acct.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/acct.h b/include/uapi/linux/acct.h
index 11b6ca3..df2f9a0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/acct.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/acct.h
@@ -107,10 +107,12 @@ struct acct_v3
#define ACORE 0x08 /* ... dumped core */
#define AXSIG 0x10 /* ... was killed by a signal */
-#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN : defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
#define ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x80 /* accounting file is big endian */
-#else
+#elif defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
#define ACCT_BYTEORDER 0x00 /* accounting file is little endian */
+#else
+#error unspecified endianness
#endif
#ifndef __KERNEL__
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 20:47 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] UAPI: Fix up endianness conditionals David Howells
2013-03-06 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/aio_abi.h David Howells
2013-03-12 16:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2013-03-12 18:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2013-03-06 20:47 ` David Howells [this message]
2013-03-06 20:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in linux/raid/md_p.h David Howells
2013-03-12 1:43 ` NeilBrown
2013-03-06 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in M32R's asm/stat.h David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130306204742.31327.46737.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®