Re: [PATCH] usb host: Faraday FUSBH200 HCD driver.

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1100 bytes --]

Hi,

(don't top-post)

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:06:18PM +0800, Yuan-Hsin Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to modify fusbh200 hcd driver following ehci-platform.c.
> However, the register definition of fusbh200 is partially incompatible
> to ehci. For fusbh200, only the elements between "command" and
> "async_next" in struct ehci_regs are consistent with ehci which means
> it would cause copious modification and duplication of ehci hcd
> driver. For example, there is no "configured_flag" register in
> fusbh200 controller, yet, ehci hcd driver accesses "configured_flag"
> in function ehci_run which would cause compile errors. Therefore,
> maybe my first patch which refers to oxu210hp-hcd is a better
> solution?

why don't you just add a quirk flag to ehci struct so that it knows it
shouldn't access CONFIGFLAG register when that's non-existent ?

There are only 5 uses of configured_flag in ehci-hcd.c, so it should be
easy to wrap that around a flag check.

Alan, would you have a better idea ? Looks like this is a non-standard
EHCI implementation.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]