mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] sched: reset lb_env when redo in load_balance()
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:13:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130320081321.GF11672@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363706483.22553.67.camel@laptop>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:21:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
> > So, now, When we redo in load_balance(), we should reset some fields of
> > lb_env to ensure that load_balance() works for initial cpu, not for other
> > cpus in its group. So correct it.
> > 
> > Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 70631e8..25c798c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5014,14 +5014,20 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
> >  
> >  	struct lb_env env = {
> >  		.sd		= sd,
> > -		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
> > -		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
> >  		.dst_grpmask    = dst_grp,
> >  		.idle		= idle,
> > -		.loop_break	= sched_nr_migrate_break,
> >  		.cpus		= cpus,
> >  	};
> >  
> > +	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
> > +	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
> > +
> > +redo:
> > +	env.dst_cpu = this_cpu;
> > +	env.dst_rq = this_rq;
> > +	env.loop = 0;
> > +	env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
> > +
> >  	/* For NEWLY_IDLE load_balancing, we don't need to consider
> >  	 * other cpus in our group */
> >  	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
> 
> OK, so this is the case where we tried to balance !this_cpu and found
> ALL_PINNED, right?
> 
> You can only get here in very weird cases where people love their
> sched_setaffinity() waaaaay too much, do we care? Why not give up?

Now that you mentioned it, I have no enough reason for this patch.
I think that giving up is more preferable to me.
I will omit this patch for next spin.

> 
> Also, looking at this, shouldn't we consider env->cpus in
> can_migrate_task() where we compute new_dst_cpu?

As previously stated, env-cpus is for src cpus, so when we decide dst_cpu,
it doesn't matter.

Really thanks for detailed review to all this patchset.
Thanks.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14  5:48 [PATCH 0/8] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  6:48     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  6:52     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: clean up move_task() and move_one_task() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:33     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-20 11:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 13:42         ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-03-20 11:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 12:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_cpu_active Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:35     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:43     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-20 12:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 13:48         ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: reset lb_env when redo " Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  8:13     ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-02-25  4:56 ` [PATCH 0/8] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19  5:11   ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130320081321.GF11672@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome