From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@gmail.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
<sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>, <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
<kgene.kim@samsung.com>, <dianders@chromium.org>,
<t.figa@samsung.com>, <p.paneri@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] usb: phy: Add APIs for runtime power management
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:54:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403135414.GG14680@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFp+6iHXW8z2sc44c1hq2au_UnUyVZEr9D0t5BM4mfqcQKZgbA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3951 bytes --]
HI,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:42:48PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> >> Adding APIs to handle runtime power management on PHY
> >> >> devices. PHY consumers may need to wake-up/suspend PHYs
> >> >> when they work across autosuspend.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> include/linux/usb/phy.h | 141
> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/phy.h b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> >> >> index 6b5978f..01bf9c1 100644
> >> >> --- a/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/usb/phy.h
> >> >> @@ -297,4 +297,145 @@ static inline const char *usb_phy_type_string(enum
> >> >> usb_phy_type type)
> >> >> return "UNKNOWN PHY TYPE";
> >> >> }
> >> >> }
> >> >> +
> >> >> +static inline void usb_phy_autopm_enable(struct usb_phy *x)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + if (!x || !x->dev) {
> >> >> + dev_err(x->dev, "no PHY or attached device available\n");
> >> >> + return;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + pm_runtime_enable(x->dev);
> >> >> +}
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > IMO we need not have wrapper APIs for runtime_enable and runtime_disable
> >> > here. Generally runtime_enable and runtime_disable is done in probe and
> >> > remove of a driver respectively. So it's better to leave the
> >> > runtime_enable/runtime_disable to be done in *phy provider* driver than
> >> > having an API for it to be done by *phy user* driver. Felipe, what do you
> >> > think?
> >>
> >> Thanks!!
> >> That's very true, runtime_enable() and runtime_disable() calls are made by
> >> *phy_provider* only. But a querry here.
> >> Wouldn't in any case a PHY consumer might want to disable runtime_pm on PHY ?
> >> Say, when consumer failed to suspend the PHY properly
> >> (*put_sync(phy->dev)* fails), how much sure is the consumer about the
> >> state of PHY ?
> >
> > no no, wait a minute. We might not want to enable runtime pm for the PHY
> > until the UDC says it can handle runtime pm, no ? I guess this makes a
> > bit of sense (at least in my head :-p).
> >
> > Imagine if PHY is runtime suspended but e.g. DWC3 isn't runtime pm
> > enabled... Does it make sense to leave that control to the USB
> > controller drivers ?
> >
> > I'm open for suggestions
>
> Of course unless the PHY consumer can handle runtime PM for PHY,
> PHY should not ideally be going into runtime_suspend.
>
> Actually trying out few things, here are my observations
>
> Enabling runtime_pm on PHY pushes PHY to go into runtime_suspend state.
> But a device detection wakes up DWC3 controller, and if i don't wake
> up PHY (using get_sync(phy->dev)) here
> in runtime_resume() callback of DWC3, i don't get PHY back in active state.
> So it becomes the duty of DWC3 controller to handle PHY's sleep and wake-up.
> Thereby it becomes logical that DWC3 controller has the right to
> enable runtime_pm
> of PHY.
>
> But there's a catch here. if there are multiple consumers of PHY (like
> USB2 type PHY can
> have DWC3 controller as well as EHCI/OHCI or even HSGadget) then in that case,
> only one of the consumer can enable runtime_pm on PHY. So who decides this.
>
> Aargh!! lot of confusion here :-(
hmmm, maybe add a flag to struct usb_phy and check it on
usb_phy_autopm_enable() ??
How does usbcore handle it ? They request class drivers to pass
supports_autosuspend, but while we should have a similar flag, that's
not enough. We also need a flag to tell us when pm_runtime has already
been enabled.
So how about:
usb_phy_autopm_enable()
{
if (!phy->suports_autosuspend)
return -ENOSYS;
if (phy->autosuspend_enabled)
return 0;
phy->autosuspend_enabled = true;
return pm_runtime_enable(phy->dev);
}
???
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 13:53 [PATCH v3 00/11] usb: dwc3/xhci/phy: Enable " Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] usb: phy: Add APIs for " Vivek Gautam
2013-04-02 8:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-02 10:34 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-02 12:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-02 12:40 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-04-23 11:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 5:08 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-04-03 6:18 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 8:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 13:12 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 13:54 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-04-03 13:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 14:10 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 14:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 14:42 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 18:14 ` Alan Stern
2013-04-04 7:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-04 8:56 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-04 9:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-04 14:46 ` Alan Stern
2013-04-23 12:42 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-23 16:53 ` Alan Stern
2013-04-23 18:05 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-23 18:12 ` Alan Stern
2013-04-24 13:12 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] USB: dwc3: Adjust runtime pm to allow autosuspend Vivek Gautam
2013-04-02 8:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 6:05 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 8:17 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] usb: dwc3: Enable runtime pm only after PHYs are initialized Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] usb: dwc3: Add runtime power management callbacks Vivek Gautam
2013-04-02 8:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-03 4:59 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] usb: dwc3: exynos: Enable runtime power management Vivek Gautam
2013-04-02 8:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] usb: xhci: Enable runtime pm in xhci-plat Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] usb: phy: samsung: Enable runtime power management on usb2phy Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] usb: phy: samsung: Enable runtime power management on usb3phy Vivek Gautam
2013-04-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] usb: phy: samsung: Add support for external reference clock Vivek Gautam
2013-04-03 17:27 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] usb: dwc3/xhci/phy: Enable runtime power management Sarah Sharp
2013-04-04 5:04 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-04 7:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-04 7:32 ` Vivek Gautam
2013-04-04 16:40 ` Sarah Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130403135414.GG14680@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gautam.vivek@samsung.com \
--cc=gautamvivek1987@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.paneri@samsung.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®