From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] perf: Adding better precise_ip field handling
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:36:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513093624.GC3708@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130511075008.GC24435@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:50:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> That's really a red herring: there's absolutely no reason why the
> kernel could not pass back the level of precision it provided.
All I've been saying is that doing random precision without feedback is
confusing.
We also don't really have a good feedback channel for this kind of thing. The
best I can come up with is tagging each and every sample with the quality it
represents. I think we can do with only one extra PERF_RECORD_MISC bit, but it
looks like we're quickly running out of those things.
But I think the biggest problem is PEBS's inability do deal with REP prefixes;
see this email from Stephane: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/1/177
It is really unfortunate for PEBS to have such a side-effect; but it makes all
memset/memcpy/memmove things appear like they have no cost. I'm very sure that
will surprise a number of people.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 +++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 4 +++-
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 57cb634..6908838 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -205,14 +205,16 @@ static inline u32 get_ibs_caps(void) { return 0; }
extern void perf_events_lapic_init(void);
/*
- * Abuse bits {3,5} of the cpu eflags register. These flags are otherwise
+ * Abuse bits {3,5,15} of the cpu eflags register. These flags are otherwise
* unused and ABI specified to be 0, so nobody should care what we do with
* them.
*
+ * CONSTANT - the IP has constant skid.
* EXACT - the IP points to the exact instruction that triggered the
* event (HW bugs exempt).
* VM - original X86_VM_MASK; see set_linear_ip().
*/
+#define PERF_EFLAGS_CONSTANT (1UL << 15)
#define PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT (1UL << 3)
#define PERF_EFLAGS_VM (1UL << 5)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 1025f3c..ca1f7dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -2078,6 +2078,8 @@ unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT)
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP;
+ else if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_CONSTANT)
+ misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_CONSTANT_SKID;
return misc;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 60250f6..757ecd4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -753,10 +753,12 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
regs.bp = pebs->bp;
regs.sp = pebs->sp;
+ regs.flags &= ~(PERF_EFLAGS_CONSTANT | PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT);
+
if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(®s))
regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
else
- regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_CONSTANT;
if (has_branch_stack(event))
data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index fb104e5..cb1f70f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
* the actual instruction that triggered the event. See also
* perf_event_attr::precise_ip.
*/
+#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_CONSTANT_SKID (1 << 12)
#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP (1 << 14)
/*
* Reserve the last bit to indicate some extended misc field
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 13:32 Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf x86: Add precise sysfs cpu pmu attribute Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf tools: Add precise object to interface sysfs precise Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 1:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-05-10 9:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf tests: Add precise event automated test Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf tools: Add a precise event qualifier Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 1:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-05-10 9:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf tools: Set maximum precise value for event 'p' modifier Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 19:43 ` David Ahern
2013-05-10 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 1:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-05-10 9:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf tools: Set maximum precise value for 'precise' term Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf tests: Add automated precise term test Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf: Document the ABI for 'precise' sysfs attribute Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 1:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-05-09 13:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf: Document the ABI for 'rdpmc' " Jiri Olsa
2013-05-09 15:07 ` [PATCH 0/9] perf: Adding better precise_ip field handling Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-09 15:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-10 9:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-05-10 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-10 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-10 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-10 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-10 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-10 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-10 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-11 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-13 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-05-13 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-14 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-14 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-14 8:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-15 13:27 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-28 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-10 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-10 9:43 ` Jiri Olsa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-26 17:27 Jiri Olsa
2013-01-26 18:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-01-27 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-27 12:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-01-27 13:02 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130513093624.GC3708@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome