Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] perf, signal x86: Fix breakpoint events overflow handling

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:44:07PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/5/15 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>:
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:29:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:25:40PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > hi,
> >> > sending v3 for initial patchset:
> >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/1/324
> >> >
> >> > basically just sending remaining (not pulled) patches,
> >> > with '*-by: *' tags updated.
> >> >
> >> > v3 changes:
> >> >   - perf test patches already pulled in
> >> >   - added Oleg's Tested-by for signal related patches
> >> >   - added Frederic's Reviewed-by for signal related patches
> >> >   - added Peter's Reviewed-by for perf patch.
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> Thomas, Peter,
> >> any chance you could pull this in?
> >>
> >> Ingo,
> >> could you please take the perf change (4/4)?
> >> it's reviewed by PeterZ
> >
> > ping
> 
> May be you can set up a branch based on v3.10-rc1 with these patches
> applied on top and send it as a pull request to Ingo (and LKML + other
> people Cc'ed). Your branch is not pullable as is because it seems to
> be based on tip:master (it's not targeted for mainline, just there for
> testing) and moreover an old enough version of it.

thanks for suggestion, will do this next time :)

jirka