mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] coredump: kill call_count, add core_name_size
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:53:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130524125323.861541a12992c3da0145f0d9@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130515201232.GA14648@redhat.com>

On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:12:32 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> Imho, "atomic_t call_count" is ugly and should die. It buys
> nothing and in fact it can grow more than necessary, expand
> doesn't check if it was already incremented by another task.
> 
> Kill it, and introduce "static int core_name_size" updated by
> expand_corename(). This is obviously racy too but harmless,
> and core_name_size never grows for no reason.
> 
> We do not bother to to calculate the "right" new size, we
> simply do kmalloc(size_we_need) and use ksize() to rely on
> kmalloc_index's decision.
> 
> Finally change format_corename() to use expand_corename(),
> krealloc(NULL) is fine.

The code still looks like a bunch of fluff.  I look at it and think
"wtf, why doesn't it just use kasprintf()". 

If there were any comments in there at all which explained the reason
for the code's existence, perhaps I wouldn't think that.  But there
aren't, so I do.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-24 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-15 20:11 [PATCH 0/6] coredump: format_corename() fixes/cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] coredump: format_corename() can leak cn->corename Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] coredump: introduce cn_vprintf() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] coredump: cn_vprintf() has no reason to call vsnprintf() twice Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] coredump: kill cn_escape(), introduce cn_esc_printf() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:26   ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] coredump: kill call_count, add core_name_size Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-24 19:53   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-05-27 15:16     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-15 20:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] coredump: '% at the end' shouldn't bypass core_uses_pid logic Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-16 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/6] coredump: format_corename() fixes/cleanups Neil Horman
     [not found] ` <20130516154323.GA19060@redhat.com>
2013-05-16 15:43   ` [PATCH 1/1] usermodehelper: check subprocess_info->path != NULL Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-16 16:16     ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-16 17:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
     [not found] ` <20130516182624.GA29455@redhat.com>
2013-05-16 18:38   ` [PATCH 7/6] coredump: avoid the uninitialized cn->corename if core_pattern is empty Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130524125323.861541a12992c3da0145f0d9@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=walters@verbum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®