From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: xilinx: Add WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT ioctl function
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:21:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130530142145.GA28856@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A75F11.7000001@monstr.eu>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:15:45PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 05/30/2013 04:07 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:26:04PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Standard watchdog programs try to setup timeout
> >> via ioctl and this functionality should be implemented.
> >> Timeout value is hardcoded in the hardware but
> >> based on Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-api.txt
> >> can return the real timeout used in the same variable.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> >> index 79f358c..a3bbe72 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> >> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static long xwdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >> xwdt_keepalive();
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> + case WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT:
> >> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> >> if (no_timeout)
> >> return -ENOTTY;
> >
> > Watchdog programs should check ident.options before trying to set the timeout.
> > If they don't, there is an application bug. I don't think it is a good idea
> > to start hacking the kernel to work around application bugs.
>
> Based on Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-api.txt
>
> "For some drivers it is possible to modify the watchdog timeout on the
> fly with the SETTIMEOUT ioctl, those drivers have the WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT
> flag set in their option field. The argument is an integer
Yes, but WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT is not set in the driver's option field.
Guenter
> representing the timeout in seconds. The driver returns the real
> timeout used in the same variable, and this timeout might differ from
> the requested one due to limitation of the hardware.
>
> int timeout = 45;
> ioctl(fd, WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT, &timeout);
> printf("The timeout was set to %d seconds\n", timeout);
>
> This example might actually print "The timeout was set to 60 seconds"
> if the device has a granularity of minutes for its timeout."
>
> should be completely fine that user application is trying to setup timeout
> and driver should return value based on it.
>
> And yes, user application should check return value from ioctl call
> but still based on documentation driver can properly support it too.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> --
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 12:26 [PATCH 1/3] watchdog: xilinx: Fix driver header Michal Simek
2013-05-30 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: xilinx: Setup the origin compatible string Michal Simek
2013-05-30 14:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-30 14:04 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: xilinx: Add WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT ioctl function Michal Simek
2013-05-30 14:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-30 14:15 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 14:21 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-05-30 14:34 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 15:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-30 15:12 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 15:25 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <CAHTX3dJ9fDJ6ggMGcF5v1vdcruMqnV4fv_6eP3U3DgOUfm8r+w@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-30 22:08 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-05-31 5:48 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] watchdog: xilinx: Fix driver header Venu Byravarasu
2013-05-30 12:32 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-30 14:26 ` Alejandro Cabrera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130530142145.GA28856@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome