From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:07:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626120749.GH28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372150039-15151-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 04:47:12PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
>
> Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing Last Branch Record
> facility to record call chains. When the feature is enabled, function
> call will be collected as normal, but as return instructions are executed
> the last captured branch record is popped from the on-chip LBR registers.
> The LBR call stack facility can help perf to get call chains of progam
> without frame pointer. When perf tool requests PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN +
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER, this feature is dynamically enabled by default.
> This feature can be disabled/enabled through an attribute file in the cpu
> pmu sysfs directory.
>
> The LBR call stack has following known limitations
> 1. Zero length calls are not filtered out by hardware
> 2. Exception handing such as setjmp/longjmp will have calls/returns not
> match
> 3. Pushing different return address onto the stack will have calls/returns
> not match
>
> These patches are based upon tip/perf/core
These patches are also done wrong; the first patches should add HSW
support for the existing features. Only then should you do patches for
new fail^wfeatures.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 8:47 Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 6:05 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:37 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 2:42 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain() Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf, x86: Use LBR call stack to get user callchain Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26 9:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 12:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 12:45 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-27 1:52 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-27 1:40 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-27 8:58 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-28 2:24 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 8:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:40 ` [PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Stephane Eranian
2013-06-25 15:27 ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-25 15:30 ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 16:40 ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 16:48 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-27 8:07 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-06-26 16:59 ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-30 6:30 Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130626120749.GH28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome