mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:11:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626171109.GN28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626165942.GF6123@two.firstfloor.org>

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:59:42PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > These patches are also done wrong; the first patches should add HSW
> > support for the existing features. Only then should you do patches for
> > new fail^wfeatures.
> 
> The basic Haswell LBR support is already in tip.

D'uh indeed. Sorry for the noise.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-26 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-25  8:47 Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:33   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26  6:05     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:37   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26  2:42     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26 11:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain() Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf, x86: Use LBR call stack to get user callchain Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26  9:00   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 12:42   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-26 12:45     ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-27  1:52       ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-27  1:40     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-27  8:58       ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-28  2:24         ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25  8:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Yan, Zheng
2013-06-25 12:40 ` [PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Stephane Eranian
2013-06-25 15:27   ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-25 15:30 ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 16:40   ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 16:48   ` Stephane Eranian
2013-06-27  8:07     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-06-26 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 16:59   ` Andi Kleen
2013-06-26 17:11     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-30  6:30 Yan, Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130626171109.GN28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome