mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jerry.hoemann@hp.com
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Brian Richardson <brian.richardson@intel.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Randy Wright <rwright@hp.com>,
	Linn Crosetto <linn.crosetto@hp.com>,
	terry.lee@hp.com, samer.el-haj-mahmoud@hp.com,
	randy.pawell@hp.com, chrisp@hp.com, linda.knippers@hp.com,
	dong.wei@hp.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] Corrupted EFI region
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:24:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130918192414.GB3345@anatevka.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130916105920.GB2697@console-pimps.org>

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:59:20AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep, at 02:38:12PM, jerry.hoemann@hp.com wrote:
> > Matt,
> > 
> > We have hit an issue on our new platform in development related to the
> > call of efi_reserve_boot_services() from setup_arch().
> > 
> > The reservation can interfere with allocation of the crash kernel.
>  
> Jerry, thanks for bringing this up.
> 
> > In pre 3.9(?) kernels,  the crash kernel is required to be allocated from
> > physically contiguous memory below 896 MB.
> > 
> > Our new platforms are large in both the amount of memory and the amount
> > of IO. This requires large crash kernels for kdump to work.  This is even
> > after the work done for makedumpfile v 1.5 to allow it to work with a
> > smaller foot print.
> > 
> > 
> > One of the problems is that drivers will allocate memory as boot code and/or
> > data in the region < 896 that effectively fragments this memory.
> > With the reservation, we can't reuse the memory when needed for the
> > crash kernels.   If we remove the reservation and allow the kernel
> > to reuse the memory,  we the reservation of the crash kernel succeeds.
> > 
> > This is definitely a problem for distros that are pre 3.9.  Probably less
> > so for top of tree, but i haven't been focused there.
> > 
> > So we are definitely interested in finding a mechanism to not
> > do this reservation on platforms that don't have the issues described
> > earlier in this thread.
> 
> OK, in an ideal world we'd move the crash kernel reservation after
> efi_free_boot_services(), because at that point the boot regions are
> available again. But it seems that we reserve the boot regions really
> early during startup and release them relatively late. The reason is
> that the Boot Graphics Resource Table (BGRT) data, if present, is
> located in the Boot Services Data regions but we can't extract the
> address of the region from the ACPI tables until we've setup the ACPI
> subsystem, which happens quite late.
> 
> I wonder whether performing the reservation of the crash kernel memory
> first, before efi_reserve_boot_services(), would help. That way we'd
> only need to reserve remaining regions in efi_reserve_boot_services().
> This scheme would rely on nothing writing into the crash kernel area
> before we've extracted the BGRT data, however.
> 
> -- 
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center


Matt,

I conducted the following experiments on a 3.11 kernel:

1)  Moved the call of reserve_crashkernel to after efi_free_boot_services.
    Booted with crashkernel=512M

    a)  when memory below 896M was *not* fragmented by BootCode segments
	reserve_crashkernel succeeded.

    b)  when memory below 896M *was* fragmented by BootCode segments
	reserve_crashkernel failed.

2)  Moved the call to reserve_crashkernel to before call to efi_reserve_boot_services.
    Booted with crashkernel=512M

    reserve_crashkernel succeeded irrespective of whether the memory below 896M was
    fragmented by BootCode segments.


I haven't determined why reserve_crashkernel failed in 1b) above.

I don't see the memory reserved for the crash kernel being accessed
before call to efi_free_boot_services.

CC'ing kexec list for their input as I may have missed something.


Jerry


-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann            Software Engineer              Hewlett-Packard/MODL

3404 E Harmony Rd. MS 57                        phone:  (970) 898-1022
Ft. Collins, CO 80528                           FAX:    (970) 898-XXXX
                                                email:  jerry.hoemann@hp.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-18 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31 20:54 Borislav Petkov
2013-07-31 20:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-07-31 21:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-31 21:54     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-01 16:51       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-31 21:55 ` David Woodhouse
2013-08-01 16:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 11:27     ` [edk2] " Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 13:02       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 13:39         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 14:03           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 14:27             ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 14:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 15:15                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 15:34                   ` James Bottomley
2013-08-05 16:27                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 16:12                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 16:41                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 16:47                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 17:00                         ` Kinney, Michael D
2013-08-05 17:09                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 21:26                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 22:08                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-06 14:10                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-06 15:31                               ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-07 15:19                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-07 17:23                                   ` Andrew Fish
2013-08-07 20:19                                     ` Matt Fleming
2013-08-07 20:24                                       ` Matt Fleming
2013-08-07 21:10                                       ` Andrew Fish
2013-08-07 21:23                                         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-08 10:17                                         ` Matt Fleming
2013-08-08 13:46                                           ` Andrew Fish
2013-09-02  8:19                                             ` Matt Fleming
2013-09-13 20:38                                           ` jerry.hoemann
2013-09-16 10:59                                             ` Matt Fleming
2013-09-16 11:50                                               ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-09-16 15:57                                                 ` Josh Triplett
2013-09-16 16:25                                                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-09-16 16:27                                                     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-16 16:29                                                     ` Josh Triplett
2013-09-18 19:24                                               ` jerry.hoemann [this message]
2013-09-20  9:06                                                 ` Matt Fleming
2013-08-07 17:49                                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-08 15:02                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-08 21:45                                       ` Brian J. Johnson
2013-08-18  7:33                                     ` Jordan Justen
2013-08-05 15:50                 ` Andrew Fish
2013-08-05 18:12                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 21:37                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-05 21:41                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-05 21:49                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-05 21:55                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-05 22:52                           ` James Bottomley
2013-08-06  7:26                             ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130918192414.GB3345@anatevka.fc.hp.com \
    --to=jerry.hoemann@hp.com \
    --cc=afish@apple.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brian.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chrisp@hp.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=dong.wei@hp.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
    --cc=linn.crosetto@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=randy.pawell@hp.com \
    --cc=rwright@hp.com \
    --cc=samer.el-haj-mahmoud@hp.com \
    --cc=terry.lee@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®