From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] anon_vmas: Convert the rwsem to an rwlock_t
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130930114406.GZ3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130928195207.GA31245@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:52:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Index: tip/mm/mmap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/mm/mmap.c
> +++ tip/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2955,15 +2955,15 @@ static void vm_lock_anon_vma(struct mm_s
> * The LSB of head.next can't change from under us
> * because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex.
> */
> - down_write_nest_lock(&anon_vma->root->rwsem, &mm->mmap_sem);
> + write_lock(&anon_vma->root->rwlock);
Tssk, you should know better...
But yes; this is the most horrid site; however I think it was mostly
file based VMAs that caused the immense amount of locks taken since this
is only done 'very' early on in the life of KVM.
I can't remember how early; I hope almost instantly and certainly before
spawning all the various vcpu threads as that would create all the
thread stacks which are anon and would indeed blow up the non-preempt
time here.
So if we keep i_mmap_mutex -- and I hope we do; that unmap_mutex horror
wasn't pretty at all -- see commit 97a894136 . The below shouldn't be
too bad I think/hope.
---
--- a/include/linux/rwlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock.h
@@ -64,6 +64,19 @@ do { \
#define write_lock(lock) _raw_write_lock(lock)
#define read_lock(lock) _raw_read_lock(lock)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+# define write_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) \
+do { \
+ typecheck(struct lockdep_map *, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
+ preempt_disable(); \
+ lock_acquire_exclusive(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, \
+ &(nest_lock)->dep_map, _RET_IP_); \
+ LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, do_raw_write_trylock, do_raw_write_lock); \
+} while (0)
+#else
+# define write_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) write_lock(lock)
+#endif
+
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2955,7 +2955,7 @@ static void vm_lock_anon_vma(struct mm_s
* The LSB of head.next can't change from under us
* because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex.
*/
- write_lock(&anon_vma->root->rwlock);
+ write_lock_nest_lock(&anon_vma->root->rwlock);
/*
* We can safely modify head.next after taking the
* anon_vma->root->rwlock. If some other vma in this mm shares
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-30 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 19:00 [PATCH] rwsem: reduce spinlock contention in wakeup code path Waiman Long
2013-09-27 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-27 19:39 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-09-27 21:49 ` Tim Chen
2013-09-28 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-28 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-28 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-28 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-28 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-30 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-01 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-01 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 15:58 ` Waiman Long
2013-10-01 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 20:03 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-28 19:37 ` [PATCH] anon_vmas: Convert the rwsem to an rwlock_t Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-28 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:52 ` [PATCH, v2] " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-30 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-09-30 17:03 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-30 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 17:10 ` Tim Chen
2013-09-30 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-30 19:23 ` Tim Chen
2013-09-30 19:35 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-30 19:47 ` Tim Chen
2013-09-30 22:03 ` Tim Chen
2013-10-01 2:41 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-30 8:52 ` [PATCH] " Andrea Arcangeli
2013-09-30 14:40 ` Jerome Glisse
2013-09-30 16:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 19:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-09-30 18:21 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-30 19:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2013-09-29 23:06 ` [PATCH] rwsem: reduce spinlock contention in wakeup code path Davidlohr Bueso
2013-09-29 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 0:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-09-30 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-30 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 1:11 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-09-30 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 16:03 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-30 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-01 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-27 19:32 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-28 0:46 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130930114406.GZ3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome