From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com>,
sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: fix spin lock and reg_cache
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:06:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131022170621.GB2620@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5266AA0F.1030603@linutronix.de>
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 06:05 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> I added reg_se_cache to cache the content of REG_SE once and
> >> synchronize it among TSC & ADC access. REG_SE is set to 0 by the HW
> >> after "work" has been done. So you need to know the old value or TSC may
> >> disable ADC and the other way around.
> >
> > Yep, it's initialised as '0'.
> >
> > 12.5.1.15 STEPENABLE Register (offset = 54h) [reset = 0h]
>
> Ehm yes but!. After init it is set to 0, correct. The value was never
> read from the HW. It was always set via am335x_tsc_se_set() to "cache
> | argument" and written to HW from both sides (TSC, ADC). This
> initialization is done at ->probe() time in both drivers.
>
> The value remains (remained) constant over the whole time
> so both drivers only called am335x_tsc_se_update() to set the value
> (the enabled steps of both sides) back to the register (because after
> the conversation the value was 0 according to my memory) and since
> 32bit reads are atomic I didn't use a lock here.
Hmm.. I'm starting to see what you mean.
So what's the point of the read before write then?
Why don't you use the cache all of the time?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 19:10 Zubair Lutfullah
2013-08-07 8:40 ` Lee Jones
2013-10-22 13:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 15:48 ` Lee Jones
2013-10-22 16:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-25 15:53 ` Zubair Lutfullah :
2013-10-22 16:05 ` Lee Jones
2013-10-22 16:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 17:06 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-10-22 17:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 17:36 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131022170621.GB2620@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®